2013 GTHL AAA

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:22 am

You do realize McDavid went to a crappy team and helped make it good. He didn't jump ship and go to a good team with better players he made players around him better.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:38 am

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:21 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:10 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:47 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:41 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:24 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:21 am

We have all heard about these same brick kids over the last couple of years. You wonder why these brick kids parents are so screwed up. They are under a lot more pressure to keep their kids relevant. Every year they need to play on teams with stronger players or their kid won't produce or get noticed. If you put Nats #9 on the Rebels, how many points would he get compare to the where he plays now? I would be willing to bet his numbers drop dramatically. Now all these kids are still good hockey players but the reality is this will change.

Gnats 9 #77 (tiny D)
#29 small and soft
#44 average nothing more
#9 Still top but floats
#8 stopped growing and not as dominant
#97 Good player with average size
#11 Goalies these days need to be 6 4", not happening

Marlies have 9 #14 to small and no IQ
#23 nothing special
#24 slow with little skill
#74 prefect example of decline
#77 average
#83 Has size with average speed
#88 average
#97 average at best
#Goalie again 6 4", not happening

JRC 5 (Most left) #9 Probably top 5 at the moment
#11 Tiny and not going anywhere
#4 average
#23 good at this age
#87 average
#31 average

VK 4 #23 average
#77 average
#91 average at best
#88 Slow and declining
So according to you there isn’t one former Brick kid who is still good? If you put any one of these kids on your team they would be the best players, no question. Your jealousy is really next level. And I’m saying that as the parent of a non brick kid.
Did you read the last sentence? So quick to comment, that's why there is some many issues with parents and coaches. Think before you speak.
It’s incredible that those teams are the best in the league with so many average and declining players! Ur an idiot. And most of those kids that I know are not rich families.
Don't you find it's funny that no brick kids play outside of these same four clubs? Why don't they try putting their superstars on a bottom 6? If they have what it takes they should be ability preform on any team.
Gnats add JS and EW this year and jump from third to first place.
TM lost JS and fell from first place to second.
JRC lost MM and EW and fell from second place to third.
VK will be much better next year with their new players.

Teams like DMF added non Brick kids and fell from 6th to 8th place.

Brick kids don't have to switch to bad teams for you to see the impact they have. The proof is right there.

VK added studs and is a top 2 team next year. TM will fall to 4 or 5. That will be the best example.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:40 am

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:22 am You do realize McDavid went to a crappy team and helped make it good. He didn't jump ship and go to a good team with better players he made players around him better.

Thats what every one of those kids you mentioned do too. If one of them played with your kid they'd put him on their back and make him look much better than he is.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:45 am

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:22 am They are the top teams because they have the top players…the coaches can tell who the best players are. It is only the delusional parents who are insecure about how average that thinks there are politics stopping their kid from being the best player.

There are many experts in hockey that tell it straight, a dad with a big belly that sells car insurance is not an expert. The scouts, coaches and GM’S will all let you know shortly if you kid is a player or not. No need to start phone calls off with “my kid is the best player on the team, he does not have much help, but he is a fast skater, has great hands and a great shot. He just needs to be an environment surrounded by a average players like your team..”

Coaches of top teams are always looking for good players on other teams. If your kid didn't get a call then that should tell you something. Try to make your kid a better player, don't spend all morning on MHT whining that he's overlooked because you aren't rich and your son hasn't had the opportunity. Attitudes like that just prove why you're a loser in life.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:46 am

Gretzky was only good because he played on top teams

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:46 am

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:46 am Gretzky was only good because he played on top teams

His parents were loaded too thats why

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:48 am

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:10 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:10 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:47 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:41 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:24 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:21 am

We have all heard about these same brick kids over the last couple of years. You wonder why these brick kids parents are so screwed up. They are under a lot more pressure to keep their kids relevant. Every year they need to play on teams with stronger players or their kid won't produce or get noticed. If you put Nats #9 on the Rebels, how many points would he get compare to the where he plays now? I would be willing to bet his numbers drop dramatically. Now all these kids are still good hockey players but the reality is this will change.

Gnats 9 #77 (tiny D)
#29 small and soft
#44 average nothing more
#9 Still top but floats
#8 stopped growing and not as dominant
#97 Good player with average size
#11 Goalies these days need to be 6 4", not happening

Marlies have 9 #14 to small and no IQ
#23 nothing special
#24 slow with little skill
#74 prefect example of decline
#77 average
#83 Has size with average speed
#88 average
#97 average at best
#Goalie again 6 4", not happening

JRC 5 (Most left) #9 Probably top 5 at the moment
#11 Tiny and not going anywhere
#4 average
#23 good at this age
#87 average
#31 average

VK 4 #23 average
#77 average
#91 average at best
#88 Slow and declining
So according to you there isn’t one former Brick kid who is still good? If you put any one of these kids on your team they would be the best players, no question. Your jealousy is really next level. And I’m saying that as the parent of a non brick kid.
Did you read the last sentence? So quick to comment, that's why there is some many issues with parents and coaches. Think before you speak.
It’s incredible that those teams are the best in the league with so many average and declining players! Ur an idiot. And most of those kids that I know are not rich families.
Don't you find it's funny that no brick kids play outside of these same four clubs? Why don't they try putting their superstars on a bottom 6? If they have what it takes they should be ability preform on any team.
What a stupid comment. They would still be standout players but have nobody to play with. Why doesn't McDavid ask for a trade to San Jose so that he can show everyone what he can really do? He's only good because he plays on a good team too right?

It's funny that you don't mention how non Brick kids try out for top 4 teams every year and get cut because they aren't good enough. Like your kid. That's a much better indicator. Its very obvious you've never played competitive sports in your life and ignorant opinions like yours are the biggest problem in youth hockey.

Your arrogance make you stupid!

Non Brick players

Nats -7
TM- 6
JRC - 8
VK - 11

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:13 am

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:48 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:10 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:10 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:47 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:41 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:24 am

So according to you there isn’t one former Brick kid who is still good? If you put any one of these kids on your team they would be the best players, no question. Your jealousy is really next level. And I’m saying that as the parent of a non brick kid.
Did you read the last sentence? So quick to comment, that's why there is some many issues with parents and coaches. Think before you speak.
It’s incredible that those teams are the best in the league with so many average and declining players! Ur an idiot. And most of those kids that I know are not rich families.
Don't you find it's funny that no brick kids play outside of these same four clubs? Why don't they try putting their superstars on a bottom 6? If they have what it takes they should be ability preform on any team.
What a stupid comment. They would still be standout players but have nobody to play with. Why doesn't McDavid ask for a trade to San Jose so that he can show everyone what he can really do? He's only good because he plays on a good team too right?

It's funny that you don't mention how non Brick kids try out for top 4 teams every year and get cut because they aren't good enough. Like your kid. That's a much better indicator. Its very obvious you've never played competitive sports in your life and ignorant opinions like yours are the biggest problem in youth hockey.
Your arrogance make you stupid!

Non Brick players

Nats -7
TM- 6
JRC - 8
VK - 11

Not to mention the Brick kids who went to Edmonton who ended up with a few points and maybe had one shift in the third in a tight game or never saw the ice at all. They were always a roster filler and could of been replaced by any half decent player in the G. The Plumbers kid , RS from JRC, Asssssals were all roster fillers who never saw the ice.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:19 am

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:46 am Gretzky was only good because he played on top teams

Well the coaches that buttered up his dad and got him to sign the card.

Let’s be honest, if WAYNE was playing on your son’s team, you would accuse his Dad of paying off the coach for ice time, his mom with sleeping with the goalie’s mom, or talk s.hit about how he is a puck hog. Then you would probably say his grandma is 4”11 and that he is going to be to small and skinny to play the game, he will get killed “when really hockey starts”.

All the people that talk smack about others and project their future have kids who are just not that exceptional and it eats them up inside. They come on here and hope that their tactics will have a negative effect on the competitors that are currently out shinning Johnny. Usually the most smiley and nicest parents to your face and the biggest scum bags behind the scenes.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:23 am

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:13 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:48 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:10 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:10 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:47 am
Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:41 am

Did you read the last sentence? So quick to comment, that's why there is some many issues with parents and coaches. Think before you speak.
It’s incredible that those teams are the best in the league with so many average and declining players! Ur an idiot. And most of those kids that I know are not rich families.
Don't you find it's funny that no brick kids play outside of these same four clubs? Why don't they try putting their superstars on a bottom 6? If they have what it takes they should be ability preform on any team.
What a stupid comment. They would still be standout players but have nobody to play with. Why doesn't McDavid ask for a trade to San Jose so that he can show everyone what he can really do? He's only good because he plays on a good team too right?

It's funny that you don't mention how non Brick kids try out for top 4 teams every year and get cut because they aren't good enough. Like your kid. That's a much better indicator. Its very obvious you've never played competitive sports in your life and ignorant opinions like yours are the biggest problem in youth hockey.
Your arrogance make you stupid!

Non Brick players

Nats -7
TM- 6
JRC - 8
VK - 11
Not to mention the Brick kids who went to Edmonton who ended up with a few points and maybe had one shift in the third in a tight game or never saw the ice at all. They were always a roster filler and could of been replaced by any half decent player in the G. The Plumbers kid , RS from JRC, Asssssals were all roster fillers who never saw the ice.

A few things are very obvious.

1. Your kid didn't make a brick team

2. You're still insecure about that.

3. You're OBSESSED with the kids that did play in the Brick (it's seriously kinda scary).

The Plumbers kid is a half decent player in the G? He's actually one of the top players and probably has more goals this year than your kid has scored in the past 3. RS would instantly become the best player on any team currently in 5th - 12th place. Fact.

Your argument was that kids are only good because they play on stacked teams and now you're pointing out that the majority of these teams are non Brick players. What does that tell you? That the Brick kids are good simply because they really are the best players!

Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

2013 GTHL AAA

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA