Ok who then?Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pmSo only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.
Updated rankings of players, as I see them.
Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12
Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86
Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
2015 AA
Re: 2015 AA
Re: 2015 AA
Is AK who you’re thinking of?Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:16 pm DD does not have an 86 that plays D
Re: 2015 AA
There is nobody else. D are all decent. The forwards other than 11 are just ok.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:09 pmOk who then?Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pmSo only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.
Updated rankings of players, as I see them.
Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12
Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86
Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
Re: 2015 AA
You’re an idiot. Who is better than TW30 and MNS 19?Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:57 pmTell me your kid plays for MNS without telling me your kid plays for MNS.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pmSo only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.
Updated rankings of players, as I see them.
Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12
Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86
Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
Only F you got right is MB and FT. Go back to scouting school.
Re: 2015 AA
The list is good, just replace MNS 4 with the FT big D, can’t remember the number.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:47 pmThere is nobody else. D are all decent. The forwards other than 11 are just ok.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:09 pmOk who then?Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pmSo only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.
Updated rankings of players, as I see them.
Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12
Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86
Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
Re: 2015 AA
The “best” team. Bud can’t read the standings.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pmSo only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.
Updated rankings of players, as I see them.
Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12
Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86
Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
Re: 2015 AA
Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:48 pmYou’re an idiot. Who is better than TW30 and MNS 19?Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:57 pmTell me your kid plays for MNS without telling me your kid plays for MNS.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pmSo only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.
Updated rankings of players, as I see them.
Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12
Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86
Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
Only F you got right is MB and FT. Go back to scouting school.
lol. First 10 on MNS is better than 19. 19 is ok. Nothing special. I don’t know who 30 on TW is. But not one kid on that team stands out. So I could name a lot of kids who are better than both… but why bother. You’re biased clearly.
Re: 2015 AA
10 on MNS is a top 10 forward, agree.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 7:51 pmGuest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:48 pmYou’re an idiot. Who is better than TW30 and MNS 19?Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:57 pmTell me your kid plays for MNS without telling me your kid plays for MNS.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pmSo only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.
Updated rankings of players, as I see them.
Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12
Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86
Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
Only F you got right is MB and FT. Go back to scouting school.
lol. First 10 on MNS is better than 19. 19 is ok. Nothing special. I don’t know who 30 on TW is. But not one kid on that team stands out. So I could name a lot of kids who are better than both… but why bother. You’re biased clearly.
TW 30 is the best underager in the loop.
Re: 2015 AA
I didnt say U10 hockey is dirty.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:59 pmIf you think 9 year old hockey is dirty just wait a few years. You’re probably better off putting your kid in ballet. They’ll be safe there.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:45 pm 30 on The Wolverines is as dirty as 29 on The Rangers.
We should not be celebrating players who try to injure their opponents. Or coaches that allow this. It’s disrespectful to every other player.![]()
But that 2 players are really dirty and most teams have come across them.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post