2015 AA

Guest

Re: 2015 AA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.

Updated rankings of players, as I see them.

Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12

Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86

Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
So only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.
Ok who then?
Guest

Re: 2015 AA

Post by Guest »

DD does not have an 86 that plays D
Guest

Re: 2015 AA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:16 pm DD does not have an 86 that plays D
Is AK who you’re thinking of?
Guest

Re: 2015 AA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:09 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.

Updated rankings of players, as I see them.

Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12

Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86

Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
So only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.
Ok who then?
There is nobody else. D are all decent. The forwards other than 11 are just ok.
Guest

Re: 2015 AA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:57 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.

Updated rankings of players, as I see them.

Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12

Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86

Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
So only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.
Tell me your kid plays for MNS without telling me your kid plays for MNS.

Only F you got right is MB and FT. Go back to scouting school.
You’re an idiot. Who is better than TW30 and MNS 19?
Guest

Re: 2015 AA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:47 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 5:09 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.

Updated rankings of players, as I see them.

Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12

Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86

Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
So only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.
Ok who then?
There is nobody else. D are all decent. The forwards other than 11 are just ok.
The list is good, just replace MNS 4 with the FT big D, can’t remember the number.
Guest

Re: 2015 AA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.

Updated rankings of players, as I see them.

Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12

Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86

Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
So only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.
The “best” team. Bud can’t read the standings.
Guest

Re: 2015 AA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:48 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:57 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.

Updated rankings of players, as I see them.

Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12

Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86

Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
So only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.
Tell me your kid plays for MNS without telling me your kid plays for MNS.

Only F you got right is MB and FT. Go back to scouting school.
You’re an idiot. Who is better than TW30 and MNS 19?

lol. First 10 on MNS is better than 19. 19 is ok. Nothing special. I don’t know who 30 on TW is. But not one kid on that team stands out. So I could name a lot of kids who are better than both… but why bother. You’re biased clearly.
Guest

Re: 2015 AA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 7:51 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 6:48 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:57 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:46 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:26 pm Going into playoffs.

Updated rankings of players, as I see them.

Forwards
MB 11
MNS 19
FT 28
TW 30
ST 12

Defencemen
MNS 9
VP 66
MNS 4
VP 61
DD 86

Goalies (1st G in each instance)
WML
MNS
HVS
Big gap after that
So only one player from the best team (Beast)? Nice try.
Tell me your kid plays for MNS without telling me your kid plays for MNS.

Only F you got right is MB and FT. Go back to scouting school.
You’re an idiot. Who is better than TW30 and MNS 19?

lol. First 10 on MNS is better than 19. 19 is ok. Nothing special. I don’t know who 30 on TW is. But not one kid on that team stands out. So I could name a lot of kids who are better than both… but why bother. You’re biased clearly.
10 on MNS is a top 10 forward, agree.

TW 30 is the best underager in the loop.
Guest

Re: 2015 AA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:59 pm
Guest wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 4:45 pm 30 on The Wolverines is as dirty as 29 on The Rangers.

We should not be celebrating players who try to injure their opponents. Or coaches that allow this. It’s disrespectful to every other player.
If you think 9 year old hockey is dirty just wait a few years. You’re probably better off putting your kid in ballet. They’ll be safe there. 😚😭
I didnt say U10 hockey is dirty.

But that 2 players are really dirty and most teams have come across them.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post