I thought Elgin was a powerhouseGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:07 amI agree with this. They should find a way to come together and give alliance another powerhouse - but Brantford kids won’t leave now. The new coach played in the NHL for years and is taking them all the way to their draft year. I wouldn’t want to leave that situationGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 10:08 pmBrantford and Waterloo top players need to figure out a way to play together. London and Elgin will swap a few kids and end up the same. Chatham has been quiet but I assume there will be a lineup of people wanting to play there.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 9:54 pmThis is not true. There are big things coming to Brantford but the roster is not set at all.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 4:31 pmSuper team incoming. They’ll compete with Chatham and the rest of the province.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 3:04 pmWhat is the rumor in Brantford? Is the team hanging around... players jumping ship?Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 2:08 pm
The score sheet says on thing, if you actually watched the games they will say another.
Brantford has a great goalie that keeps them hanging around. He is definitely one that can steal a game for his team maybe a series.
New roster is almost set. Major changes
Alliance 2012 Hockey
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Chatham is the only Alliance powerhouse at this age group. I'm sure there are a few kids that would want to play for Chatham but is the team looking for anyone to add?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 11:59 amI thought Elgin was a powerhouseGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:07 amI agree with this. They should find a way to come together and give alliance another powerhouse - but Brantford kids won’t leave now. The new coach played in the NHL for years and is taking them all the way to their draft year. I wouldn’t want to leave that situationGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 10:08 pmBrantford and Waterloo top players need to figure out a way to play together. London and Elgin will swap a few kids and end up the same. Chatham has been quiet but I assume there will be a lineup of people wanting to play there.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 9:54 pmThis is not true. There are big things coming to Brantford but the roster is not set at all.
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Mm.. I would say Chatham, EMC and LGK are all very strong. Next year will be interesting to see who moves where.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:26 pmChatham is the only Alliance powerhouse at this age group. I'm sure there are a few kids that would want to play for Chatham but is the team looking for anyone to add?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 11:59 amI thought Elgin was a powerhouseGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:07 amI agree with this. They should find a way to come together and give alliance another powerhouse - but Brantford kids won’t leave now. The new coach played in the NHL for years and is taking them all the way to their draft year. I wouldn’t want to leave that situationGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 10:08 pmBrantford and Waterloo top players need to figure out a way to play together. London and Elgin will swap a few kids and end up the same. Chatham has been quiet but I assume there will be a lineup of people wanting to play there.
Chatham doesn’t “need” anything but a few of their current players could be edged out by the open borders
EMC needs better goalies and a few defence
LGK needs better defence and could also use 1 goalie
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Choose coaching wisely. Chatham develops their players at this ageGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:59 pmMm.. I would say Chatham, EMC and LGK are all very strong. Next year will be interesting to see who moves where.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:26 pmChatham is the only Alliance powerhouse at this age group. I'm sure there are a few kids that would want to play for Chatham but is the team looking for anyone to add?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 11:59 amI thought Elgin was a powerhouseGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:07 amI agree with this. They should find a way to come together and give alliance another powerhouse - but Brantford kids won’t leave now. The new coach played in the NHL for years and is taking them all the way to their draft year. I wouldn’t want to leave that situationGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 10:08 pmBrantford and Waterloo top players need to figure out a way to play together. London and Elgin will swap a few kids and end up the same. Chatham has been quiet but I assume there will be a lineup of people wanting to play there.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 9:54 pm
This is not true. There are big things coming to Brantford but the roster is not set at all.
Chatham doesn’t “need” anything but a few of their current players could be edged out by the open borders
EMC needs better goalies and a few defence
LGK needs better defence and could also use 1 goalie
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Both London goalies are good, no need to change.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:59 pmMm.. I would say Chatham, EMC and LGK are all very strong. Next year will be interesting to see who moves where.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:26 pmChatham is the only Alliance powerhouse at this age group. I'm sure there are a few kids that would want to play for Chatham but is the team looking for anyone to add?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 11:59 amI thought Elgin was a powerhouseGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:07 amI agree with this. They should find a way to come together and give alliance another powerhouse - but Brantford kids won’t leave now. The new coach played in the NHL for years and is taking them all the way to their draft year. I wouldn’t want to leave that situationGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 10:08 pmBrantford and Waterloo top players need to figure out a way to play together. London and Elgin will swap a few kids and end up the same. Chatham has been quiet but I assume there will be a lineup of people wanting to play there.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 9:54 pm
This is not true. There are big things coming to Brantford but the roster is not set at all.
Chatham doesn’t “need” anything but a few of their current players could be edged out by the open borders
EMC needs better goalies and a few defence
LGK needs better defence and could also use 1 goalie
Elgin cut D that are better then their bottom 3
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Bingo! All about coaching and development.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:23 pmChoose coaching wisely. Chatham develops their players at this ageGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:59 pmMm.. I would say Chatham, EMC and LGK are all very strong. Next year will be interesting to see who moves where.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:26 pmChatham is the only Alliance powerhouse at this age group. I'm sure there are a few kids that would want to play for Chatham but is the team looking for anyone to add?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 11:59 amI thought Elgin was a powerhouseGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:07 amI agree with this. They should find a way to come together and give alliance another powerhouse - but Brantford kids won’t leave now. The new coach played in the NHL for years and is taking them all the way to their draft year. I wouldn’t want to leave that situationGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 10:08 pm
Brantford and Waterloo top players need to figure out a way to play together. London and Elgin will swap a few kids and end up the same. Chatham has been quiet but I assume there will be a lineup of people wanting to play there.
Chatham doesn’t “need” anything but a few of their current players could be edged out by the open borders
EMC needs better goalies and a few defence
LGK needs better defence and could also use 1 goalie
LJK has 2 solid goaltenders.
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Bad coaches come in many forms, ones who play favorites or are enabling of top players and neglectful toward weaker ones. many youth coaches want to win at the cost of development of everyone on the team. let’s not forget daddy who builds the season around making sure little no names looks goodGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 7:57 pmBingo! All about coaching and development.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:23 pmChoose coaching wisely. Chatham develops their players at this ageGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:59 pmMm.. I would say Chatham, EMC and LGK are all very strong. Next year will be interesting to see who moves where.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:26 pmChatham is the only Alliance powerhouse at this age group. I'm sure there are a few kids that would want to play for Chatham but is the team looking for anyone to add?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 11:59 amI thought Elgin was a powerhouseGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:07 am
I agree with this. They should find a way to come together and give alliance another powerhouse - but Brantford kids won’t leave now. The new coach played in the NHL for years and is taking them all the way to their draft year. I wouldn’t want to leave that situation
Chatham doesn’t “need” anything but a few of their current players could be edged out by the open borders
EMC needs better goalies and a few defence
LGK needs better defence and could also use 1 goalie
LJK has 2 solid goaltenders.
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
EMC needs d and 2 goaliesGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 7:57 pmBingo! All about coaching and development.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:23 pmChoose coaching wisely. Chatham develops their players at this ageGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:59 pmMm.. I would say Chatham, EMC and LGK are all very strong. Next year will be interesting to see who moves where.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:26 pmChatham is the only Alliance powerhouse at this age group. I'm sure there are a few kids that would want to play for Chatham but is the team looking for anyone to add?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 11:59 amI thought Elgin was a powerhouseGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 9:07 am
I agree with this. They should find a way to come together and give alliance another powerhouse - but Brantford kids won’t leave now. The new coach played in the NHL for years and is taking them all the way to their draft year. I wouldn’t want to leave that situation
Chatham doesn’t “need” anything but a few of their current players could be edged out by the open borders
EMC needs better goalies and a few defence
LGK needs better defence and could also use 1 goalie
LJK has 2 solid goaltenders.
LGK needs d
Chathams good
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
EMC needs to develop players. They are given chances and blow them every single year at every single age group because they don’t have the right people in place.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:45 amEMC needs d and 2 goaliesGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 7:57 pmBingo! All about coaching and development.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:23 pmChoose coaching wisely. Chatham develops their players at this ageGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:59 pmMm.. I would say Chatham, EMC and LGK are all very strong. Next year will be interesting to see who moves where.
Chatham doesn’t “need” anything but a few of their current players could be edged out by the open borders
EMC needs better goalies and a few defence
LGK needs better defence and could also use 1 goalie
LJK has 2 solid goaltenders.
LGK needs d
Chathams good
Chatham takes kids who were passed on and turns them into hockey players. That’s why they’re good.
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
lol you are hell bent on rehashing the same line.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:06 amEMC needs to develop players. They are given chances and blow them every single year at every single age group because they don’t have the right people in place.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 6:45 amEMC needs d and 2 goaliesGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 7:57 pmBingo! All about coaching and development.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:23 pmChoose coaching wisely. Chatham develops their players at this ageGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:59 pmMm.. I would say Chatham, EMC and LGK are all very strong. Next year will be interesting to see who moves where.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:26 pm
Chatham is the only Alliance powerhouse at this age group. I'm sure there are a few kids that would want to play for Chatham but is the team looking for anyone to add?
Chatham doesn’t “need” anything but a few of their current players could be edged out by the open borders
EMC needs better goalies and a few defence
LGK needs better defence and could also use 1 goalie
LJK has 2 solid goaltenders.
LGK needs d
Chathams good
Chatham takes kids who were passed on and turns them into hockey players. That’s why they’re good.
Individually some kids are failing to progress.. and others are getting better .. that is life
Kids plateau.. some younger, some older.. Chatham had kids that were on their team last year, that didn’t make it this year.. did their coach fail to develop those kids? Or did they just plateau.
LGK is in 3rd.. are they not developing to be able to beat Chatham? Or are the kids just doing their best?
EMC is in 2nd.. they lost a great forward with some scoring power. They are still also doing great.
And again.. the top three team are all doing really good.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 12859 Views
-
Last post by 2011needagoalie