2013 GTHL AAA

Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:32 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:21 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:47 am
Guest wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:17 pm
Guest wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:22 pm
Guest wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:19 pm

And most of these kids are selected to play in top tournaments such as Best of The Best, Hockey Etc, Euro trips, Elite spring teams and they will always continue to be selected.
This sounds very expensive tbh
Over the next few years the genetics will show. Then we will be dealing with a whole new set of parents.
Parents with little guys don’t want to believe this
We have all heard about these same brick kids over the last couple of years. You wonder why these brick kids parents are so screwed up. They are under a lot more pressure to keep their kids relevant. Every year they need to play on teams with stronger players or their kid won't produce or get noticed. If you put Nats #9 on the Rebels, how many points would he get compare to the where he plays now? I would be willing to bet his numbers drop dramatically. Now all these kids are still good hockey players but the reality is this will change.

Gnats 9 #77 (tiny D)
#29 small and soft
#44 average nothing more
#9 Still top but floats
#8 stopped growing and not as dominant
#97 Good player with average size
#11 Goalies these days need to be 6 4", not happening

Marlies have 9 #14 to small and no IQ
#23 nothing special
#24 slow with little skill
#74 prefect example of decline
#77 average
#83 Has size with average speed
#88 average
#97 average at best
#Goalie again 6 4", not happening

JRC 5 (Most left) #9 Probably top 5 at the moment
#11 Tiny and not going anywhere
#4 average
#23 good at this age
#87 average
#31 average

VK 4 #23 average
#77 average
#91 average at best
#88 Slow and declining
Literally the most insecure and jealous post I’ve ever read on here, and there have been some doozies
The loser who wrote that has a kid on DMF and is obsessed with these former brick kids. He’d trade his left nut for his kid to have half the talent of any of these boys.

His money bought him a spot on AAA but can’t buy his kid success on the ice just like it can’t for kids like JA from TM, HB from TYN, LW from JRC and ther list goes on
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Brick kids have success because there parents have money. Reality is that money talks in hockey.

If your kid isn't a brick kid than don't worry ... but success is harder to come by because they have to work for it and you wont always be there to buy it for them. But if they find success it will be 10 times better ... so just keep making sure they are putting the work in.

The cream of crop always rises to the top. Just some times it's a lot harder to get there.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:41 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:24 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:21 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:47 am
Guest wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:17 pm
Guest wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:22 pm

This sounds very expensive tbh
Over the next few years the genetics will show. Then we will be dealing with a whole new set of parents.
Parents with little guys don’t want to believe this
We have all heard about these same brick kids over the last couple of years. You wonder why these brick kids parents are so screwed up. They are under a lot more pressure to keep their kids relevant. Every year they need to play on teams with stronger players or their kid won't produce or get noticed. If you put Nats #9 on the Rebels, how many points would he get compare to the where he plays now? I would be willing to bet his numbers drop dramatically. Now all these kids are still good hockey players but the reality is this will change.

Gnats 9 #77 (tiny D)
#29 small and soft
#44 average nothing more
#9 Still top but floats
#8 stopped growing and not as dominant
#97 Good player with average size
#11 Goalies these days need to be 6 4", not happening

Marlies have 9 #14 to small and no IQ
#23 nothing special
#24 slow with little skill
#74 prefect example of decline
#77 average
#83 Has size with average speed
#88 average
#97 average at best
#Goalie again 6 4", not happening

JRC 5 (Most left) #9 Probably top 5 at the moment
#11 Tiny and not going anywhere
#4 average
#23 good at this age
#87 average
#31 average

VK 4 #23 average
#77 average
#91 average at best
#88 Slow and declining
So according to you there isn’t one former Brick kid who is still good? If you put any one of these kids on your team they would be the best players, no question. Your jealousy is really next level. And I’m saying that as the parent of a non brick kid.
Did you read the last sentence? So quick to comment, that's why there is some many issues with parents and coaches. Think before you speak.
It’s incredible that those teams are the best in the league with so many average and declining players! Ur an idiot. And most of those kids that I know are not rich families.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:45 am Brick kids have success because there parents have money. Reality is that money talks in hockey.

If your kid isn't a brick kid than don't worry ... but success is harder to come by because they have to work for it and you wont always be there to buy it for them. But if they find success it will be 10 times better ... so just keep making sure they are putting the work in.

The cream of crop always rises to the top. Just some times it's a lot harder to get there.
They are cream of the crop at brick. No DMF kid is even close to that level. Kids like LaC*ck and Stewart and Cootoo get dominated by these boys that’s why they can’t make those teams
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:45 am Brick kids have success because there parents have money. Reality is that money talks in hockey.

If your kid isn't a brick kid than don't worry ... but success is harder to come by because they have to work for it and you wont always be there to buy it for them. But if they find success it will be 10 times better ... so just keep making sure they are putting the work in.

The cream of crop always rises to the top. Just some times it's a lot harder to get there.
Your kid got cut from the brick tryouts 2 years ago and you still aren’t over it
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:52 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:45 am Brick kids have success because there parents have money. Reality is that money talks in hockey.

If your kid isn't a brick kid than don't worry ... but success is harder to come by because they have to work for it and you wont always be there to buy it for them. But if they find success it will be 10 times better ... so just keep making sure they are putting the work in.

The cream of crop always rises to the top. Just some times it's a lot harder to get there.
They are cream of the crop at brick. No DMF kid is even close to that level. Kids like LaC*ck and Stewart and Cootoo get dominated by these boys that’s why they can’t make those teams
STFU Ben I know it’s you trolling
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:47 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:41 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:24 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:21 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:47 am
Guest wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:17 pm

Over the next few years the genetics will show. Then we will be dealing with a whole new set of parents.
Parents with little guys don’t want to believe this
We have all heard about these same brick kids over the last couple of years. You wonder why these brick kids parents are so screwed up. They are under a lot more pressure to keep their kids relevant. Every year they need to play on teams with stronger players or their kid won't produce or get noticed. If you put Nats #9 on the Rebels, how many points would he get compare to the where he plays now? I would be willing to bet his numbers drop dramatically. Now all these kids are still good hockey players but the reality is this will change.

Gnats 9 #77 (tiny D)
#29 small and soft
#44 average nothing more
#9 Still top but floats
#8 stopped growing and not as dominant
#97 Good player with average size
#11 Goalies these days need to be 6 4", not happening

Marlies have 9 #14 to small and no IQ
#23 nothing special
#24 slow with little skill
#74 prefect example of decline
#77 average
#83 Has size with average speed
#88 average
#97 average at best
#Goalie again 6 4", not happening

JRC 5 (Most left) #9 Probably top 5 at the moment
#11 Tiny and not going anywhere
#4 average
#23 good at this age
#87 average
#31 average

VK 4 #23 average
#77 average
#91 average at best
#88 Slow and declining
So according to you there isn’t one former Brick kid who is still good? If you put any one of these kids on your team they would be the best players, no question. Your jealousy is really next level. And I’m saying that as the parent of a non brick kid.
Did you read the last sentence? So quick to comment, that's why there is some many issues with parents and coaches. Think before you speak.
It’s incredible that those teams are the best in the league with so many average and declining players! Ur an idiot. And most of those kids that I know are not rich families.
Don't you find it's funny that no brick kids play outside of these same four clubs? Why don't they try putting their superstars on a bottom 6? If they have what it takes they should be ability preform on any team.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:10 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:47 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:41 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:24 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:21 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:47 am

Parents with little guys don’t want to believe this
We have all heard about these same brick kids over the last couple of years. You wonder why these brick kids parents are so screwed up. They are under a lot more pressure to keep their kids relevant. Every year they need to play on teams with stronger players or their kid won't produce or get noticed. If you put Nats #9 on the Rebels, how many points would he get compare to the where he plays now? I would be willing to bet his numbers drop dramatically. Now all these kids are still good hockey players but the reality is this will change.

Gnats 9 #77 (tiny D)
#29 small and soft
#44 average nothing more
#9 Still top but floats
#8 stopped growing and not as dominant
#97 Good player with average size
#11 Goalies these days need to be 6 4", not happening

Marlies have 9 #14 to small and no IQ
#23 nothing special
#24 slow with little skill
#74 prefect example of decline
#77 average
#83 Has size with average speed
#88 average
#97 average at best
#Goalie again 6 4", not happening

JRC 5 (Most left) #9 Probably top 5 at the moment
#11 Tiny and not going anywhere
#4 average
#23 good at this age
#87 average
#31 average

VK 4 #23 average
#77 average
#91 average at best
#88 Slow and declining
So according to you there isn’t one former Brick kid who is still good? If you put any one of these kids on your team they would be the best players, no question. Your jealousy is really next level. And I’m saying that as the parent of a non brick kid.
Did you read the last sentence? So quick to comment, that's why there is some many issues with parents and coaches. Think before you speak.
It’s incredible that those teams are the best in the league with so many average and declining players! Ur an idiot. And most of those kids that I know are not rich families.
Don't you find it's funny that no brick kids play outside of these same four clubs? Why don't they try putting their superstars on a bottom 6? If they have what it takes they should be ability preform on any team.
What a stupid comment. They would still be standout players but have nobody to play with. Why doesn't McDavid ask for a trade to San Jose so that he can show everyone what he can really do? He's only good because he plays on a good team too right?

It's funny that you don't mention how non Brick kids try out for top 4 teams every year and get cut because they aren't good enough. Like your kid. That's a much better indicator. Its very obvious you've never played competitive sports in your life and ignorant opinions like yours are the biggest problem in youth hockey.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 9:10 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:47 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:41 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:24 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 8:21 am
Guest wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 6:47 am

Parents with little guys don’t want to believe this
We have all heard about these same brick kids over the last couple of years. You wonder why these brick kids parents are so screwed up. They are under a lot more pressure to keep their kids relevant. Every year they need to play on teams with stronger players or their kid won't produce or get noticed. If you put Nats #9 on the Rebels, how many points would he get compare to the where he plays now? I would be willing to bet his numbers drop dramatically. Now all these kids are still good hockey players but the reality is this will change.

Gnats 9 #77 (tiny D)
#29 small and soft
#44 average nothing more
#9 Still top but floats
#8 stopped growing and not as dominant
#97 Good player with average size
#11 Goalies these days need to be 6 4", not happening

Marlies have 9 #14 to small and no IQ
#23 nothing special
#24 slow with little skill
#74 prefect example of decline
#77 average
#83 Has size with average speed
#88 average
#97 average at best
#Goalie again 6 4", not happening

JRC 5 (Most left) #9 Probably top 5 at the moment
#11 Tiny and not going anywhere
#4 average
#23 good at this age
#87 average
#31 average

VK 4 #23 average
#77 average
#91 average at best
#88 Slow and declining
So according to you there isn’t one former Brick kid who is still good? If you put any one of these kids on your team they would be the best players, no question. Your jealousy is really next level. And I’m saying that as the parent of a non brick kid.
Did you read the last sentence? So quick to comment, that's why there is some many issues with parents and coaches. Think before you speak.
It’s incredible that those teams are the best in the league with so many average and declining players! Ur an idiot. And most of those kids that I know are not rich families.
Don't you find it's funny that no brick kids play outside of these same four clubs? Why don't they try putting their superstars on a bottom 6? If they have what it takes they should be ability preform on any team.
Gnats add JS and EW this year and jump from third to first place.
TM lost JS and fell from first place to second.
JRC lost MM and EW and fell from second place to third.
VK will be much better next year with their new players.

Teams like DMF added non Brick kids and fell from 6th to 8th place.

Brick kids don't have to switch to bad teams for you to see the impact they have. The proof is right there.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

They are the top teams because they have the top players…the coaches can tell who the best players are. It is only the delusional parents who are insecure about how average that thinks there are politics stopping their kid from being the best player.

There are many experts in hockey that tell it straight, a dad with a big belly that sells car insurance is not an expert. The scouts, coaches and GM’S will all let you know shortly if you kid is a player or not. No need to start phone calls off with “my kid is the best player on the team, he does not have much help, but he is a fast skater, has great hands and a great shot. He just needs to be an environment surrounded by a average players like your team..”
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post