Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:32 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 12:40 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 12:19 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 12:16 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 11:45 am Who is replacing #8 on D for JRC?

Is EM leaving? He should be the JRC starter! He would be top goalie on 8-9 teams

EM is an average goalie! If he was that good he’d be a starter on a top 4 team.

He’s better than CN and had more signature wins this year. DV just likes the $$$$ from CN parents

Isn't DV one of the more respected coaches in the league? You sound like a piss off parent that thinks his kid is better than he really is. If EM is so good, he shouldn’t have any problems finding a starter spot with another team.

Does he tell you he's one of the more respected coaches in the league?
Do you believe that with the season JRC has had?
CN's failures this season speak for themself. That hurts your feelings. AAAArrrrggggghhhhhh!!!!!!

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 9:31 am So, JRC cut CT and are now bringing in two F's so far TRW #67 and Reps #91. #86 and #87 haven't committed yet. Is that it for the forwards? What about the D and goalies?

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:47 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:32 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 12:40 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 12:19 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 12:16 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 11:45 am Who is replacing #8 on D for JRC?

Is EM leaving? He should be the JRC starter! He would be top goalie on 8-9 teams

EM is an average goalie! If he was that good he’d be a starter on a top 4 team.

He’s better than CN and had more signature wins this year. DV just likes the $$$$ from CN parents

Isn't DV one of the more respected coaches in the league? You sound like a piss off parent that thinks his kid is better than he really is. If EM is so good, he shouldn’t have any problems finding a starter spot with another team.

Does he tell you he's one of the more respected coaches in the league?
Do you believe that with the season JRC has had?
CN's failures this season speak for themself. That hurts your feelings. AAAArrrrggggghhhhhh!!!!!!

CN's failures? I thought this was a team sport. Was there any goalie controversy on JRC before EM came in? If I remember correctly, JRC was a championship team before this season.

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 5:51 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 9:31 am So, JRC cut CT and are now bringing in two F's so far TRW #67 and Reps #91. #86 and #87 haven't committed yet. Is that it for the forwards? What about the D and goalies?

ACTRW huge “team” sponsorship paid for #67 and #89 team fees. Is he getting a free ride on JRC as well?

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 5:51 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 9:31 am So, JRC cut CT and are now bringing in two F's so far TRW #67 and Reps #91. #86 and #87 haven't committed yet. Is that it for the forwards? What about the D and goalies?

ACTRW huge “team” sponsorship paid for #67 and #89 team fees. Is he getting a free ride on JRC as well?

He likely won't even be a top 6 forward. There's no chance he plays for free.
As for 89, he has 15 goals this year so far. How much $$$ is that per goal? $675?

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:25 pm If someone made a team just of kids who got cut from top 4 teams would it be any good?

FORWARDS (pick 9)
19 - JRC
87 - JRC
86 - JRC
77 - TM
88 - TM
14 - TM
17 - TM
98 - TM
16 - VK
91 - VK
19 - VK
13 - TYN
10 - TYN

DEFENCE
8 - JRC
53 - TM
18 - TYN
52 - TYN
77 - VK

GOALIES
MM - VK
EM - JRC

Solid forward group, below average defence but decent goalies. So not too shabby!

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:27 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:25 pm If someone made a team just of kids who got cut from top 4 teams would it be any good?

FORWARDS (pick 9)
19 - JRC
87 - JRC
86 - JRC
77 - TM
88 - TM
14 - TM
17 - TM
98 - TM
16 - VK
91 - VK
19 - VK
13 - TYN
10 - TYN

DEFENCE
8 - JRC
53 - TM
18 - TYN
52 - TYN
77 - VK

GOALIES
MM - VK
EM - JRC

Solid forward group, below average defence but decent goalies. So not too shabby!

That d group would get crushed

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:41 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:27 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:25 pm If someone made a team just of kids who got cut from top 4 teams would it be any good?

FORWARDS (pick 9)
19 - JRC
87 - JRC
86 - JRC
77 - TM
88 - TM
14 - TM
17 - TM
98 - TM
16 - VK
91 - VK
19 - VK
13 - TYN
10 - TYN

DEFENCE
8 - JRC
53 - TM
18 - TYN
52 - TYN
77 - VK

GOALIES
MM - VK
EM - JRC

Solid forward group, below average defence but decent goalies. So not too shabby!

That d group would get crushed

Tm 88 wears he going ?

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:44 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:41 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:27 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:25 pm If someone made a team just of kids who got cut from top 4 teams would it be any good?

FORWARDS (pick 9)
19 - JRC
87 - JRC
86 - JRC
77 - TM
88 - TM
14 - TM
17 - TM
98 - TM
16 - VK
91 - VK
19 - VK
13 - TYN
10 - TYN

DEFENCE
8 - JRC
53 - TM
18 - TYN
52 - TYN
77 - VK

GOALIES
MM - VK
EM - JRC

Solid forward group, below average defence but decent goalies. So not too shabby!

That d group would get crushed

Tm 88 wears he going ?

VK. His dad is trying to take over the team.