2011 AAA
Re: 2011 AAA
I measure maturity by reviewing parent height and using some calculations to project height and size. If the player is not at 90% of that potential achieved height I consider them a find.
Yes I have been watching 2011. I noticed a top line player on for reps both parents good size. I like a couple players on the rebels top lines good speed and size. Nats have a couple also, TM there is a couple of very intriguing players on that team. I am open to suggestions.
Yes I have been watching 2011. I noticed a top line player on for reps both parents good size. I like a couple players on the rebels top lines good speed and size. Nats have a couple also, TM there is a couple of very intriguing players on that team. I am open to suggestions.
Re: 2011 AAA
sudbury kids going to marlies next year is confirmed.........If new goalie plays every game, tm will take 1st spot.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:07 pm I measure maturity by reviewing parent height and using some calculations to project height and size. If the player is not at 90% of that potential achieved height I consider them a find.
Yes I have been watching 2011. I noticed a top line player on for reps both parents good size. I like a couple players on the rebels top lines good speed and size. Nats have a couple also, TM there is a couple of very intriguing players on that team. I am open to suggestions.
Re: 2011 AAA
coaches report cards
VK A+ (recruited hard and created buy in. on track to do the same thing for next year)
JRC B- (had alot of turnover still managed to secure 2nd place)
TM D- (could have been much better this season if coach made obvious changes)
TN B (managed to maintain competitive with not much talent)
Reps F (fired)
MR F (quit on his team)
NYR F (fired)
MS D (can only recruit with free rides)
MM A (big jump from aa to aaa and earned respect of the league
TT B+ (shown improvement year over year. next year will be stronger)
TRW F (tire fire all around)
DMF C (not much can be done with this roster)
VK A+ (recruited hard and created buy in. on track to do the same thing for next year)
JRC B- (had alot of turnover still managed to secure 2nd place)
TM D- (could have been much better this season if coach made obvious changes)
TN B (managed to maintain competitive with not much talent)
Reps F (fired)
MR F (quit on his team)
NYR F (fired)
MS D (can only recruit with free rides)
MM A (big jump from aa to aaa and earned respect of the league
TT B+ (shown improvement year over year. next year will be stronger)
TRW F (tire fire all around)
DMF C (not much can be done with this roster)
Re: 2011 AAA
What about IQ? It appears my friend you are an idiot.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:07 pm I measure maturity by reviewing parent height and using some calculations to project height and size. If the player is not at 90% of that potential achieved height I consider them a find.
Yes I have been watching 2011. I noticed a top line player on for reps both parents good size. I like a couple players on the rebels top lines good speed and size. Nats have a couple also, TM there is a couple of very intriguing players on that team. I am open to suggestions.
You can be 6' 4 but if you have little IQ no one is interested. Maturity is not just size but your level of intelligence which you appear to lack.
Re: 2011 AAA
Wow, I am actually shocked right now, most have no idea what the percentage even means (the implications). Good on you. What would you consider a top on team, mid tier player and 86% of full adult stature ?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:07 pm I measure maturity by reviewing parent height and using some calculations to project height and size. If the player is not at 90% of that potential achieved height I consider them a find.
Yes I have been watching 2011. I noticed a top line player on for reps both parents good size. I like a couple players on the rebels top lines good speed and size. Nats have a couple also, TM there is a couple of very intriguing players on that team. I am open to suggestions.
Re: 2011 AAA
I look for skill, speed that will translate with growth, and toughness. Key to me is transferable skills to the pro game. I only get paid if they sign a pro contract so I have to be smart and selective. It also worries the amount of bashing on this site.
Re: 2011 AAA
Many are just insecure because they have not Ben through this before !Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:51 pm I look for skill, speed that will translate with growth, and toughness. Key to me is transferable skills to the pro game. I only get paid if they sign a pro contract so I have to be smart and selective. It also worries the amount of bashing on this site.
Re: 2011 AAA
Have you ever noticed that the highest IQ players seem to be the best skaters ? Hmmmmm wonder why….. there are some slower players with good IQ but the top end are all bite too skaters !Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:36 pmWhat about IQ? It appears my friend you are an idiot.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 3:07 pm I measure maturity by reviewing parent height and using some calculations to project height and size. If the player is not at 90% of that potential achieved height I consider them a find.
Yes I have been watching 2011. I noticed a top line player on for reps both parents good size. I like a couple players on the rebels top lines good speed and size. Nats have a couple also, TM there is a couple of very intriguing players on that team. I am open to suggestions.
You can be 6' 4 but if you have little IQ no one is interested. Maturity is not just size but your level of intelligence which you appear to lack.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post