Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:45 am These facts are facts refs have it out for a few teams and the MT are top of the list. Games are meaningless until playoffs. Better have some better refs.

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:45 am These facts are facts refs have it out for a few teams and the MT are top of the list. Games are meaningless until playoffs. Better have some better refs.

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:55 am Last week we ranked the parent groups. Today we rank the coaching staffs.

10.) WM - Coaches/Parents should be aware enough to tell most of those kids should be in A.
9.) ST - Awful coaching, no system, loud, screamers
8.) FT - No preparation, no care for development.
7.) MNS - Has a couple good kids, but there hasn't been much development over the years
6.) VR - Coach is mental. They just play one line every shift and hope they can carry them to a win.
5.) MT - 1 good coach, the rest don't know what's going on. Team started well but have been below average as of late.
4.) HVS - some kids developed, some have not. Break out well as a team. Parent coaches that seem to focus on their kid.
3.) MB - Full non-parent staff, depth players clearly getting better.
Top end talent has stayed. Most improved team from start to finish.
2.) TE- Most consistent team all year and biggest improvement from last year. Parent coaches yes, but one of the more realistic parent coaching staffs, don't favourite their kids
1.) TW - pretty easy, guy played in the show, his experience alone is enough to push the development and get the kids to learn the game the right way.

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:18 am

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:55 am Last week we ranked the parent groups. Today we rank the coaching staffs.

10.) WM - Coaches/Parents should be aware enough to tell most of those kids should be in A.
9.) ST - Awful coaching, no system, loud, screamers
8.) FT - No preparation, no care for development.
7.) MNS - Has a couple good kids, but there hasn't been much development over the years
6.) VR - Coach is mental. They just play one line every shift and hope they can carry them to a win.
5.) MT - 1 good coach, the rest don't know what's going on. Team started well but have been below average as of late.
4.) HVS - some kids developed, some have not. Break out well as a team. Parent coaches that seem to focus on their kid.
3.) MB - Full non-parent staff, depth players clearly getting better.
Top end talent has stayed. Most improved team from start to finish.
2.) TE- Most consistent team all year and biggest improvement from last year. Parent coaches yes, but one of the more realistic parent coaching staffs, don't favourite their kids
1.) TW - pretty easy, guy played in the show, his experience alone is enough to push the development and get the kids to learn the game the right way.

Loser alert, MB parent wrote this guaranteed! Thinking they know about hockey, who you kidding? Half of your team can't skate.

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:24 am Not falling apart at all. Ramping up to go deep in the playoffs. Just need some good refs

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:18 am

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:55 am Last week we ranked the parent groups. Today we rank the coaching staffs.

10.) WM - Coaches/Parents should be aware enough to tell most of those kids should be in A.
9.) ST - Awful coaching, no system, loud, screamers
8.) FT - No preparation, no care for development.
7.) MNS - Has a couple good kids, but there hasn't been much development over the years
6.) VR - Coach is mental. They just play one line every shift and hope they can carry them to a win.
5.) MT - 1 good coach, the rest don't know what's going on. Team started well but have been below average as of late.
4.) HVS - some kids developed, some have not. Break out well as a team. Parent coaches that seem to focus on their kid.
3.) MB - Full non-parent staff, depth players clearly getting better.
Top end talent has stayed. Most improved team from start to finish.
2.) TE- Most consistent team all year and biggest improvement from last year. Parent coaches yes, but one of the more realistic parent coaching staffs, don't favourite their kids
1.) TW - pretty easy, guy played in the show, his experience alone is enough to push the development and get the kids to learn the game the right way.

Loser alert, MB parent wrote this guaranteed! Thinking they know about hockey, who you kidding? Half of your team can't skate.

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:36 am

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:33 am

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:26 am

Guest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:02 am MT beat the ST. Don’t care what the scoreboard said !!
Bad refs.

Everytime MT loses it's somebody else's fault.. it's hilarious that you guys walk around like gods gift to hockey but reality is you have 6-7 really decent AA Players and 7 bad players. You are not good.

Bad coaching, Bad parent group, bad team

Did you see the refs? They are always against us. Lost half our games due to poor refs not calling things against us.

Shocker MT blames the refs again. Maybe if your coach kept his mouth shut and stopped belittling refs you'd get a call. Or maybe little Tommy just needs to go down to A. Refs don't cost teams games.