2009 Alliance

Guest

Re: 2009 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 11:55 am
Guest wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 8:33 am EMC is exactly where they should be based on their players. This coach blaming and shaming is simply coming from certain parents of kids not playing. That's all it is. Very mediocre group of players with no studs... what did you expect. EMC and London... very similar to say the least,

Top couple players very comparible with 10 London being better

16 and 7 EMC = 10 and 17 London = give London the win on this one due to 10 being better .

Bye
10 is a give away machine
17 insane family

No thanks to either
I heard that 3,10 and 17 were the three to make the big O from LJK.
Guest

Re: 2009 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:27 am
Guest wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 11:55 am
Guest wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 8:33 am EMC is exactly where they should be based on their players. This coach blaming and shaming is simply coming from certain parents of kids not playing. That's all it is. Very mediocre group of players with no studs... what did you expect. EMC and London... very similar to say the least,

Top couple players very comparible with 10 London being better

16 and 7 EMC = 10 and 17 London = give London the win on this one due to 10 being better .

Bye
10 is a give away machine
17 insane family

No thanks to either
I heard that 3,10 and 17 were the three to make the big O from LJK.
10 might have a chance, but it wont be next year.
Guest

Re: 2009 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:10 am
Guest wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:27 am
Guest wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 11:55 am
Guest wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 8:33 am EMC is exactly where they should be based on their players. This coach blaming and shaming is simply coming from certain parents of kids not playing. That's all it is. Very mediocre group of players with no studs... what did you expect. EMC and London... very similar to say the least,

Top couple players very comparible with 10 London being better

16 and 7 EMC = 10 and 17 London = give London the win on this one due to 10 being better .

Bye
10 is a give away machine
17 insane family

No thanks to either
I heard that 3,10 and 17 were the three to make the big O from LJK.
10 might have a chance, but it wont be next year.
3 is lazy
Guest

Re: 2009 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Who will take first place?
1- HPL
2- Waterloo
3- SC
Guest

Re: 2009 Alliance

Post by Guest »

potential drafted players from london

10
16
3
4
17
5
maybe 1
Guest

Re: 2009 Alliance

Post by Guest »

16 and 5 LJK have been making noise together, dynamic duo out there and is a pleasure to watch. Both draft stocks have increased significantly. Good for them honestly, coming from a non LJK parent.
Guest

Re: 2009 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:13 pm potential drafted players from london

10
16
3
4
17
5
maybe 1

Your telling me 7 players from London will be drafted? Come on now
Guest

Re: 2009 Alliance

Post by Guest »

There will be no one drafted from LJK !!!!
Only be goalie in the alliance from HP will be drafted.
If anyone from lJK it will be round 15.
Guest

Re: 2009 Alliance

Post by Guest »

If 16 is drafted from LJK then daddy paid for it
Guest

Re: 2009 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Talking to some scouts most come to watch the team LJK are playing. 3,10 and 17 were the chosen 3 but most are saying they are not coachable and have not matured in their play.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post