I think next year is the last year for all those kids except 67 if any of them even made a AAA team for next season. None of those kids can skate, they are already professional bench warmers, have no hockey sense and delusional parents who will do anything to keep their kid relevant. News flash if your kid is t getting top 6 minutes put them in AA where they can developGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 12:15 amGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:32 pm24 being moved to forward. Don’t think he can play D anymore.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:51 pm14 & 24 are the best D pair in the league. Hands down.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:49 pmGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:34 pm TRW # 12, 67, 2, and 19 all got cut by SC.
Big RE #67 has 5 goals this year in 32 games and thats the most of any of those plugs.
We've got 89 up front and 24 on the back end, we'll be just fine.
We also have 14 on D as well. We will be just fine. Go TRW!!
Next year will be his last year in AAA anyway.
2013 GTHL AAA
-
Guest
Re: 2013 GTHL AAA
-
Guest
Re: 2013 GTHL AAA
14? Come on Hamburgler, lets come back to reality. Weren't you promise by SC to play forward? You are such a loser!Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:51 pm14 & 24 are the best D pair in the league. Hands down.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:49 pmGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:34 pm TRW # 12, 67, 2, and 19 all got cut by SC.
Big RE #67 has 5 goals this year in 32 games and thats the most of any of those plugs.
We've got 89 up front and 24 on the back end, we'll be just fine.
We also have 14 on D as well. We will be just fine. Go TRW!!
-
Guest
Re: 2013 GTHL AAA
As long as coaches take $$ there will always be a spot. Also it’s easier to just recycle these benchwarmers through different mid/bottom teams then actually recruit players. When you know you are not in top 4 does it really matterGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:30 amI think next year is the last year for all those kids except 67 if any of them even made a AAA team for next season. None of those kids can skate, they are already professional bench warmers, have no hockey sense and delusional parents who will do anything to keep their kid relevant. News flash if your kid is t getting top 6 minutes put them in AA where they can developGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 12:15 amGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:32 pm24 being moved to forward. Don’t think he can play D anymore.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:51 pm14 & 24 are the best D pair in the league. Hands down.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:49 pmGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:34 pm TRW # 12, 67, 2, and 19 all got cut by SC.
Big RE #67 has 5 goals this year in 32 games and thats the most of any of those plugs.
We've got 89 up front and 24 on the back end, we'll be just fine.
We also have 14 on D as well. We will be just fine. Go TRW!!
Next year will be his last year in AAA anyway.
-
Guest
Re: 2013 GTHL AAA
Exactly and that's also the reason top 4 doesn't mean nothing for a few years. Top 4 teams have great players but also jersey chasers, friends of the guy with the ring and $$$ players. There are good players on the other teams, I have been through this once before. Watch who grows and skates next two seasons. Size and speed will matter not who your daddy is. So much BS here. Go get some cheesies and watch the show. LosersGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:27 amAs long as coaches take $$ there will always be a spot. Also it’s easier to just recycle these benchwarmers through different mid/bottom teams then actually recruit players. When you know you are not in top 4 does it really matterGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:30 amI think next year is the last year for all those kids except 67 if any of them even made a AAA team for next season. None of those kids can skate, they are already professional bench warmers, have no hockey sense and delusional parents who will do anything to keep their kid relevant. News flash if your kid is t getting top 6 minutes put them in AA where they can develop
-
Guest
Re: 2013 GTHL AAA
If you’ve actually been through this before then you’re about to fail twice. There’s a reason teams are in the top 4. They have the best players, and, for the most part, the best coaching. Playing alongside the best players every day and having the best coaching = accelerated development for all players on that team.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:35 amExactly and that's also the reason top 4 doesn't mean nothing for a few years. Top 4 teams have great players but also jersey chasers, friends of the guy with the ring and $$$ players. There are good players on the other teams, I have been through this once before. Watch who grows and skates next two seasons. Size and speed will matter not who your daddy is. So much BS here. Go get some cheesies and watch the show. LosersGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:27 amAs long as coaches take $$ there will always be a spot. Also it’s easier to just recycle these benchwarmers through different mid/bottom teams then actually recruit players. When you know you are not in top 4 does it really matterGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:30 amI think next year is the last year for all those kids except 67 if any of them even made a AAA team for next season. None of those kids can skate, they are already professional bench warmers, have no hockey sense and delusional parents who will do anything to keep their kid relevant. News flash if your kid is t getting top 6 minutes put them in AA where they can develop
You don’t learn a lot playing for a bad team, so don’t pretend that it doesn’t matter and it’s all a level playing field at this age. It isn’t. The kids on the top 4 teams are getting more development than other kids just by who they’re playing and practicing with, and that includes goalies. Goalies on mid pack or bad teams may face a lot of shots in games, but it’s better to face three times that amount of shots from the best players in practice. It matters, whether you want to admit it or not.
-
Guest
Re: 2013 GTHL AAA
67 has grown early, that doesn’t mean he’s going to continue to grow like that. Mom and Dad are not especially tall. 67 is also not a great hockey player. Take away his size and nobody would look twice. Once he gets past his early growth spurt and everybody else catches up and passes him, his perceived advantage will be over.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:30 amI think next year is the last year for all those kids except 67 if any of them even made a AAA team for next season. None of those kids can skate, they are already professional bench warmers, have no hockey sense and delusional parents who will do anything to keep their kid relevant. News flash if your kid is t getting top 6 minutes put them in AA where they can developGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 12:15 amGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:32 pm24 being moved to forward. Don’t think he can play D anymore.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:51 pm14 & 24 are the best D pair in the league. Hands down.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:49 pmGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:34 pm TRW # 12, 67, 2, and 19 all got cut by SC.
Big RE #67 has 5 goals this year in 32 games and thats the most of any of those plugs.
We've got 89 up front and 24 on the back end, we'll be just fine.
We also have 14 on D as well. We will be just fine. Go TRW!!
Next year will be his last year in AAA anyway.
Kids who mature early and have parents who are under 5’10” are not going to have 6’ tall kids, it’s basic physiology and genetics. They matured early and thus have an advantage early, but by 14 or 15 that will be long gone. LT from Quebec is a good example.
Kids who don’t mature early and have parents under 5’10” also won’t grow up to be big, so they shouldn’t be thinking they will be either.
And yes I am a doctor, and I’m also under 5’10”.
-
Guest
Re: 2013 GTHL AAA
Hi BarryGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:51 am67 has grown early, that doesn’t mean he’s going to continue to grow like that. Mom and Dad are not especially tall. 67 is also not a great hockey player. Take away his size and nobody would look twice. Once he gets past his early growth spurt and everybody else catches up and passes him, his perceived advantage will be over.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:30 amI think next year is the last year for all those kids except 67 if any of them even made a AAA team for next season. None of those kids can skate, they are already professional bench warmers, have no hockey sense and delusional parents who will do anything to keep their kid relevant. News flash if your kid is t getting top 6 minutes put them in AA where they can develop
Kids who mature early and have parents who are under 5’10” are not going to have 6’ tall kids, it’s basic physiology and genetics. They matured early and thus have an advantage early, but by 14 or 15 that will be long gone. LT from Quebec is a good example.
Kids who don’t mature early and have parents under 5’10” also won’t grow up to be big, so they shouldn’t be thinking they will be either.
And yes I am a doctor, and I’m also under 5’10”.
-
Guest
Re: 2013 GTHL AAA
Best coaching isn't guaranteed in Top 4. Wrong anyways, it's Top 5, then the restGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:42 amIf you’ve actually been through this before then you’re about to fail twice. There’s a reason teams are in the top 4. They have the best players, and, for the most part, the best coaching. Playing alongside the best players every day and having the best coaching = accelerated development for all players on that team.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:35 amExactly and that's also the reason top 4 doesn't mean nothing for a few years. Top 4 teams have great players but also jersey chasers, friends of the guy with the ring and $$$ players. There are good players on the other teams, I have been through this once before. Watch who grows and skates next two seasons. Size and speed will matter not who your daddy is. So much BS here. Go get some cheesies and watch the show. LosersGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:27 amAs long as coaches take $$ there will always be a spot. Also it’s easier to just recycle these benchwarmers through different mid/bottom teams then actually recruit players. When you know you are not in top 4 does it really matterGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:30 amI think next year is the last year for all those kids except 67 if any of them even made a AAA team for next season. None of those kids can skate, they are already professional bench warmers, have no hockey sense and delusional parents who will do anything to keep their kid relevant. News flash if your kid is t getting top 6 minutes put them in AA where they can develop
You don’t learn a lot playing for a bad team, so don’t pretend that it doesn’t matter and it’s all a level playing field at this age. It isn’t. The kids on the top 4 teams are getting more development than other kids just by who they’re playing and practicing with, and that includes goalies. Goalies on mid pack or bad teams may face a lot of shots in games, but it’s better to face three times that amount of shots from the best players in practice. It matters, whether you want to admit it or not.
-
Guest
Re: 2013 GTHL AAA
Who’s a coach on a team outside of the top 4 who’s better than the top 4 coaches?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:13 amBest coaching isn't guaranteed in Top 4. Wrong anyways, it's Top 5, then the restGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:42 amIf you’ve actually been through this before then you’re about to fail twice. There’s a reason teams are in the top 4. They have the best players, and, for the most part, the best coaching. Playing alongside the best players every day and having the best coaching = accelerated development for all players on that team.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:35 amExactly and that's also the reason top 4 doesn't mean nothing for a few years. Top 4 teams have great players but also jersey chasers, friends of the guy with the ring and $$$ players. There are good players on the other teams, I have been through this once before. Watch who grows and skates next two seasons. Size and speed will matter not who your daddy is. So much BS here. Go get some cheesies and watch the show. LosersGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:27 amAs long as coaches take $$ there will always be a spot. Also it’s easier to just recycle these benchwarmers through different mid/bottom teams then actually recruit players. When you know you are not in top 4 does it really matterGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:30 amI think next year is the last year for all those kids except 67 if any of them even made a AAA team for next season. None of those kids can skate, they are already professional bench warmers, have no hockey sense and delusional parents who will do anything to keep their kid relevant. News flash if your kid is t getting top 6 minutes put them in AA where they can develop
You don’t learn a lot playing for a bad team, so don’t pretend that it doesn’t matter and it’s all a level playing field at this age. It isn’t. The kids on the top 4 teams are getting more development than other kids just by who they’re playing and practicing with, and that includes goalies. Goalies on mid pack or bad teams may face a lot of shots in games, but it’s better to face three times that amount of shots from the best players in practice. It matters, whether you want to admit it or not.
TRW - nope.
DMF - not even close.
MM - maybe AS
REPS - nope. Pond hockey.
REBELS - LD but he’s not HC and also leaving.
TT - not even close.
Sens - No
NYR - Good but nope.
-
Guest
Re: 2013 GTHL AAA
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:05 amHi BarryGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:51 am67 has grown early, that doesn’t mean he’s going to continue to grow like that. Mom and Dad are not especially tall. 67 is also not a great hockey player. Take away his size and nobody would look twice. Once he gets past his early growth spurt and everybody else catches up and passes him, his perceived advantage will be over.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:30 amI think next year is the last year for all those kids except 67 if any of them even made a AAA team for next season. None of those kids can skate, they are already professional bench warmers, have no hockey sense and delusional parents who will do anything to keep their kid relevant. News flash if your kid is t getting top 6 minutes put them in AA where they can develop
Kids who mature early and have parents who are under 5’10” are not going to have 6’ tall kids, it’s basic physiology and genetics. They matured early and thus have an advantage early, but by 14 or 15 that will be long gone. LT from Quebec is a good example.
Kids who don’t mature early and have parents under 5’10” also won’t grow up to be big, so they shouldn’t be thinking they will be either.
And yes I am a doctor, and I’m also under 5’10”.
I’m Asian, 5’6” and genetically short on both sides of my maternal and paternal sides. My wife is Asian, 5’2”, come from a long line of short people. We have 2 sons. The oldest is 16 and 5’11” and still growing and our 13 year old is 5’9” and still growing. I think it’s the food?
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 1 Replies
- 15354 Views
-
Last post by rgbcolours