Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:41 pmTypical Covid zealot cognitive dissonance ad hominem argument when the facts hit home. Go get your kid boosted.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 7:33 pmTake your political BS and go F yourself you jerkoff. I bet you're on of those aholes selling flags on street corners that has not worked a real job in 10 years you scumbag.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:20 pmHaha. Agreed… masculinity is for chicks loser.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 6:13 pmlol , “with more masculinity “ that is too funny. Theses type of guys will think you are being serious though.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 5:18 pmI find it amazing that you out- smarted the world. Doctors, PHD’s, bio researchers…….. you KNEW more than all of them combined. Such an amazing individual, I am in awe. Like who cares if you are completely unaccomplished, with no real education and a rather insignificant job……… this did not hold you back …… you still out-smarted them……. And may I add with much more masculinity than any of those bookworms! Way to go pal, even random strangers must admire you , keep up the good work!Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 12:52 pm
If I was saying this was a giant conspiracy and all the data was fake, I would say that. But I didn’t so why would you ask?
What I am saying is your data is preposterously false. 20% death rate from Covid? Maybe you are not good at math. Worst case data on Wikipedia shows the worst rates of death were 0.5%. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-1 ... by_country
But recall whatever rates you need to justify why you agreed to wear your masks, give your kids experimental drugs and the fact that you have zero balls or brains.
Lastly, I call BS on you knowing 20 that died unless you live in a nursing home/hospital/funeral home.
2011 AAA
Re: 2011 AAA
Re: 2011 AAA
So what! Being a top scorer is not always the true indicator.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:17 pm19 isnt even top 5 on VK in scoring.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:14 pm10,19, 11Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:07 pmThis is incorrect. VK doesn’t have that much top playersGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:43 pmVKGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 8:41 pmAnyone seen a list like this for Canadian players?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 4:22 pm For those of you who know the Americans, how accurate is this list? I know some of these names.
https://www.eliteprospects.com/ranking- ... 1-forwards
VK
VK
JRC (BuT hEs SiXTeEn)
VK
Sudbury
VK
TM
JRC
VK
Probably
They have 3 top F
The rest of the crew are interchangeable with majority of the league. The true testament of how good you are is to remove yourself from a top team and what can you do one your own, hence why 19 will be the top F in the next two years. He played with less talented players and still was top 3 in the league in scoring.
Remove any of those 3 and they’ll have an impact anywhere, just like 87 in Barrie.
Not one TM can do that and only 1 JRC = DW can.
#19 is an all round player, again top 3.
Other players racked up points just playing with #10 & #11.
Literally tap in goals...
Tell me this isn't true.
Re: 2011 AAA
Top 10 no names including d
TM
VK
Sudbury
EMS
JRC
VK
TM
JRC
Thunder Bay
Sens
RW (year up)
Honourable mention
Nats (year up)
TM
VK
TM
VK
Sudbury
EMS
JRC
VK
TM
JRC
Thunder Bay
Sens
RW (year up)
Honourable mention
Nats (year up)
TM
VK
Re: 2011 AAA
GF, SP and RP no longer top 10. Period!Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:51 pm Top 10 no names including d
TM
VK
Sudbury
EMS
JRC
VK
TM
JRC
Thunder Bay
Sens
RW (year up)
Honourable mention
Nats (year up)
TM
VK
Who's Thunder Bay?!?!?
Missing
HH
NSW
Re: 2011 AAA
nobody on hh or nsw should be in this convo. maybe cow.
Re: 2011 AAA
87 in Barrie had no impact. Team was in 7th place last year and are in 7th place this year in OMHA eastGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:14 pm10,19, 11Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:07 pmThis is incorrect. VK doesn’t have that much top playersGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 9:43 pmVKGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 8:41 pmAnyone seen a list like this for Canadian players?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2025 4:22 pm For those of you who know the Americans, how accurate is this list? I know some of these names.
https://www.eliteprospects.com/ranking- ... 1-forwards
VK
VK
JRC (BuT hEs SiXTeEn)
VK
Sudbury
VK
TM
JRC
VK
Probably
They have 3 top F
The rest of the crew are interchangeable with majority of the league. The true testament of how good you are is to remove yourself from a top team and what can you do one your own, hence why 19 will be the top F in the next two years. He played with less talented players and still was top 3 in the league in scoring.
Remove any of those 3 and they’ll have an impact anywhere, just like 87 in Barrie.
Not one TM can do that and only 1 JRC = DW can.
My hockey ranking has Barrie at 38 this year and 35 last year.
So if anything he has brought the team down a notch.
Keep dreaming TH he will be 3rd line at best on VK
Re: 2011 AAA
Tm tied reps????
Re: 2011 AAA
NL is irrelevantGuest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 12:02 am NL on HH was a top kid. The rest of HH all interchangeable.
Re: 2011 AAA
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 12889 Views
-
Last post by 2011needagoalie