I think your sarcasm meter is broken. Yes, exactly, you can’t claim an innocent mistake on 14 incorrect game sheets.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:45 amMore MR ignorance. Crying 9.13(b) says "understandable mistake". Firstly, the only thing understandable here is they you didn't understand the rules and made the mistake in thinking the rules didn't actually matter and didn't need to be followed. But secondly, the rules literally say that failure to review game sheet or team roster doesn't count as an understandable mistake. It literally says this directly in the rules. How dumb can MR be. But playoffs are set now so hopefully we don't have to hear any more MR crying on this stupid matter.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:41 amWhat about making an “understandable mistake” … 14 times?Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:36 am This is exactly as the GTHL rule book says. "But officer, I didn't know I was speeding because nobody told me the speed limit and I didn't bother trying to find it out." Stupid MR making up stupid excuses for there ignorance of the rules.
9.11 – No Non-Registered Individuals on Bench
Except in the case of injury to their child, non-registered individuals are not permitted under any circumstances on the Team’s bench during a game. Where it is found that a non-registered individual is on the bench and is participating in the game, the game shall be recorded as a 1-0 victory in favour of the non-offending Team except in the case of a game won by the non-offending Team, in which case, the actual score shall stand. Further, the Team Official found responsible for permitting the non-registered individual to be on the bench will be suspended for six games.
9.13 – Effect of an Ineligible Player or Team Official Participating in a Game
(b) Where a Club or Team Official submits that the participation of an ineligible player or Team Official was the result of an understandable mistake (and not an error resulting from a failure to review the Official Game Report or the Team’s roster form), and where the points lost by the Team as a result of this Regulation would exceed six (6), the Club or Team Official may provide a written explanation to the Executive Director and request a hearing before a Special Committee to determine whether or not circumstances exist for relief from this Regulation.
2009 GTHL AA West
Re: 2009 GTHL AA West
Re: 2009 GTHL AA West
Because kids want to play hockey. Play MR in the first round and there's a good chance VP is done after one series. Play the team who otherwise would have finished eighth and they very likely play at least two rounds and probably at least three. They would probably play MR anyway, so might as well get to play a bunch of other games too.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:46 amI don't even see how VP is punished. Granted they would have played a legit 8 seed team, but they would have to play the Rattlers eventually not to mention, this coach is going AAA AND this VP team has played AAA tournaments all year. Don't they want some sort of challenge? I think if my kid was there, I'd be bored crushing teams all year and want to play a top team righ5 away.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:32 amLmao so I guess the VP's are the only team that actually gets punished from all of this. They should start there own petition and website now. Good luck to the VP's. I hope you sweeps the RATs away!Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:28 amThe G will do what they want and they did. Do not poke the bear! All that crying and whining from the MR parents for nothing. Good luck against VP and all the best to the kids that had to earn their playoff spot twice. Kudos to them!
Re: 2009 GTHL AA West
Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:47 am MR VS VP first round it’s official
Wow the G did not reinstate their points - shame on them for not doing the right thing
Re: 2009 GTHL AA West
This will be a great game to watch ! Very unfair for VP to have to verse the 2nd place team and not the true 8th place teamGuest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:47 am MR VS VP first round it’s official
Re: 2009 GTHL AA West
Really MR was just wasting everyone's time drawing out this pointless process and appeal. VR is sitting on a 2 week break since there last game, waiting for the stupid Rattlers to finish crying.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 10:31 amMore accurately the OHF upheld the decision on appeal. Because it’s a black and white decision.
Re: 2009 GTHL AA West
Heard Terriers and Jets are scrapping half their team for next season. Anyone know what other teams will be doing the same or imploding?
Re: 2009 GTHL AA West
Scraping half your team is one thing, but you better have something to replace them with. We see this every year. The bottom teams drop half their rosters, but because they were bottom teams it isn't like they can attract top players, so all they do is bring up other lower level players and just keep losing again. So unless they are able to do some big recruiting and have some way to attract some higher end players, it'll just be the same thing next season. It all comes down to the quality and connections of the coach for who they can bring in.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 10:59 am Heard Terriers and Jets are scrapping half their team for next season. Anyone know what other teams will be doing the same or imploding?
Re: 2009 GTHL AA West
Most teams will implode due to boundary changes.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 10:59 am Heard Terriers and Jets are scrapping half their team for next season. Anyone know what other teams will be doing the same or imploding?
Re: 2009 GTHL AA West
MB vs ST
Season Series 1-1
MB 3 - ST 1
ST 2 - MB 1
Too close to call. Difference in winner will be goaltending.
TE vs MNS
Season Series 2-1 TE
TE 2 - MNS 1
TE 4 - MNS 0
MNS 3 - TE 1
TE offense too much for MNS. TE 6-2.
VR vs TR
Season Series 1-1-1
TR 3 - VR 1
VR 5 - TR 1
TR 2 - VR 2
Should be VR but would not be surprised if TR upsets.
VP vs MR
Season Series 1-1-1
VP 2 - MR 0
VP 2 - MR 2
MR 5 - VP 3
Too close to call. Difference in winner will be execution on special teams.
Season Series 1-1
MB 3 - ST 1
ST 2 - MB 1
Too close to call. Difference in winner will be goaltending.
TE vs MNS
Season Series 2-1 TE
TE 2 - MNS 1
TE 4 - MNS 0
MNS 3 - TE 1
TE offense too much for MNS. TE 6-2.
VR vs TR
Season Series 1-1-1
TR 3 - VR 1
VR 5 - TR 1
TR 2 - VR 2
Should be VR but would not be surprised if TR upsets.
VP vs MR
Season Series 1-1-1
VP 2 - MR 0
VP 2 - MR 2
MR 5 - VP 3
Too close to call. Difference in winner will be execution on special teams.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 1232 Views
-
Last post by MillerTime