2010 GTHL A East

Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

I don't understand. According to OHF rules that is supposed to be a forfeit. Not a tie.
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

What are you guys are talking about? It still says 4-2 for West Hill with all 3 games showing. Hit refresh or something.
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 1:58 pm He played in game 2 and was dressed ready to step on and game three. That's all on the West Hill coaching staff.
5 minutes for fighting equals suspension, what coach doesn’t know this. Shame on them, now those kids have to battle back, good luck to them.
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:07 pm What are you guys are talking about? It still says 4-2 for West Hill with all 3 games showing. Hit refresh or something.
Agreed
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:07 pm What are you guys are talking about? It still says 4-2 for West Hill with all 3 games showing. Hit refresh or something.
It just changed back to 4-2 with the game listed. My Guess is their still bickering about it. 5 min major for fighting is a 1 game suspension, ignorance isn't an excuse. kid played should be a forfeit, 4-2 SIR. Keep checking this will definitely change again, if not, SIR can protest the entire series... and will win!
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:32 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:07 pm What are you guys are talking about? It still says 4-2 for West Hill with all 3 games showing. Hit refresh or something.
It just changed back to 4-2 with the game listed. My Guess is their still bickering about it. 5 min major for fighting is a 1 game suspension, ignorance isn't an excuse. kid played should be a forfeit, 4-2 SIR. Keep checking this will definitely change again, if not, SIR can protest the entire series... and will win!
If SIR wants to win this on technicality, they are the low lifes everyone says they are. They are the more talented team and will likely win on skill alone in the next two games. This debacle simply shows their true colours
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:35 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:32 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:07 pm What are you guys are talking about? It still says 4-2 for West Hill with all 3 games showing. Hit refresh or something.
It just changed back to 4-2 with the game listed. My Guess is their still bickering about it. 5 min major for fighting is a 1 game suspension, ignorance isn't an excuse. kid played should be a forfeit, 4-2 SIR. Keep checking this will definitely change again, if not, SIR can protest the entire series... and will win!
If SIR wants to win this on technicality, they are the low lifes everyone says they are. They are the more talented team and will likely win on skill alone in the next two games. This debacle simply shows their true colours
did SIR play a player that was suspended? Did SIR not bother to check the rule book? how about we just bring back all players and play the series then.... since technicalities don't matter and all.
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:35 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:32 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:07 pm What are you guys are talking about? It still says 4-2 for West Hill with all 3 games showing. Hit refresh or something.
It just changed back to 4-2 with the game listed. My Guess is their still bickering about it. 5 min major for fighting is a 1 game suspension, ignorance isn't an excuse. kid played should be a forfeit, 4-2 SIR. Keep checking this will definitely change again, if not, SIR can protest the entire series... and will win!
If SIR wants to win this on technicality, they are the low lifes everyone says they are. They are the more talented team and will likely win on skill alone in the next two games. This debacle simply shows their true colours
What has SIR exactly done wrong in this situation? Our suspended players sat and continue to sit the games they were handed. If this rule comes back to hurt WH, that is not our mistake.

Can you imagine this message board if this was reversed, and SIR played with suspended players....

Low lifes? What is wrong with everyone on here...you would think we come to the rink with guns and inflict violence

We get it...all remaining teams want this upset to happen so the path is easier....
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

What an embarrassment for SIR. Supposedly the best team in Ontario, now going to the league and asking for a game they lost on the ice to be handed to them? The sheet didn’t show a suspension code nor did the league notify the WH team of a suspension. SIR goons instigated a fight, the kid did nothing but defend himself after his helmet was ripped off by SIR 10 which charged from outside.

Forever to be known as the the Scheming Ice Raiders.
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:43 pm What an embarrassment for SIR. Supposedly the best team in Ontario, now going to the league and asking for a game they lost on the ice to be handed to them? The sheet didn’t show a suspension code nor did the league notify the WH team of a suspension. SIR goons instigated a fight, the kid did nothing but defend himself after his helmet was ripped off by SIR 10 which charged from outside.

Forever to be known as the the Scheming Ice Raiders.
relax Doris. we broke the rules, we accept the punishment.... you broke the rules, not your fault, you didn't know, it's not fair. ((stomps feet and leaves, slamming door))
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post