2010 GTHL A East

Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 3:52 pm Who wants to talk face to face. you think us parents want to argue in the rink with other parent groups. Should we slug it out like 12 year olds. WTf is wrong with you people. It is better to trash each other online and avoid the police being called to the rink to scrape the Scarborough parents off the floor! GO VRE
All this drama for A hockey? :lol:
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Anyone watch the FH TA game? TA is getting man handled out there. looks like FH is really coming alive. Just smothered the Aeros good players. goaltending was on point. Aeros adios muchachos!
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 3:54 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 3:52 pm Who wants to talk face to face. you think us parents want to argue in the rink with other parent groups. Should we slug it out like 12 year olds. WTf is wrong with you people. It is better to trash each other online and avoid the police being called to the rink to scrape the Scarborough parents off the floor! GO VRE
All this drama for A hockey? :lol:
A AA AAA
whats the difference? 99% are going to be beer leaguers. Us A parents should be not passionate about our kids hockey. Moron
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 3:23 pm Points still listed at 4-2, but if you click on the series game 2 is gone, showing 1 win a piece. Me thinks the drama is just starting!
The GTHL made an error on game sheet #1 that indicated 1 player suspension versus 2. While WH unaware of any wrongdoing they played 1 of those kids in game 2. The scheming ice raiders took note of this. Then they held onto this info, confronted WH with it 20 mins before game 3, and said if they sat the kid in question for game 3 that they wouldn’t protest game 2. WH took their word for it and agreed to sit the player even though they were unsure if he was even suspended. They didn’t have enough time to check with league on protocols, so they took less risky route and sat kid Clearly schemers didn’t expect WH to win game 3.
So, as low life’s do, they reneged on their word, and protested WH win in game 2. Too afraid of the 8th place team I guess. Classless, spineless.
If it had been a clear fault by west hill, and rules were broken, the game would have easily been reversed and the Schemers would be up 4-2 right now, even though they lost game 2 on ice. But it’s not the case. GTHL muddied this too much that they are simply replaying game 2 tonight. Making it as if game 2 never happened. But screen shots live forever. As do reputations. The kids know the reality, the coaches know the truth, and everybody else probably will too.
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 4:11 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 3:23 pm Points still listed at 4-2, but if you click on the series game 2 is gone, showing 1 win a piece. Me thinks the drama is just starting!
The GTHL made an error on game sheet #1 that indicated 1 player suspension versus 2. While WH unaware of any wrongdoing they played 1 of those kids in game 2. The scheming ice raiders took note of this. Then they held onto this info, confronted WH with it 20 mins before game 3, and said if they sat the kid in question for game 3 that they wouldn’t protest game 2. WH took their word for it and agreed to sit the player even though they were unsure if he was even suspended. They didn’t have enough time to check with league on protocols, so they took less risky route and sat kid Clearly schemers didn’t expect WH to win game 3.
So, as low life’s do, they reneged on their word, and protested WH win in game 2. Too afraid of the 8th place team I guess. Classless, spineless.
If it had been a clear fault by west hill, and rules were broken, the game would have easily been reversed and the Schemers would be up 4-2 right now, even though they lost game 2 on ice. But it’s not the case. GTHL muddied this too much that they are simply replaying game 2 tonight. Making it as if game 2 never happened. But screen shots live forever. As do reputations. The kids know the reality, the coaches know the truth, and everybody else probably will too.
Thank you for sharing these details. Would the SIR coach like to confirm or deny the part about lodging a complaint after agreeing not to?
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Classic ice raiders, of course those low lifes can’t accept the 8th seed pulling an upset on them so they scheme. Losers
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 3:55 pm Anyone watch the FH TA game? TA is getting man handled out there. looks like FH is really coming alive. Just smothered the Aeros good players. goaltending was on point. Aeros adios muchachos!
Aeros are in a mess. Player told Aeros coach off and was MIA last night. One goalie has been replaced. Parent coach has committed to new kids for next year but wont share who has been cut, upset families want her removed from the bench. High tensions. Still hoping we play them in the next round.
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

West hill parents..... just stop.... it's embarrassing now.
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

What’s telling about the Scheming Ice Raiders drama is that the coaches have no faith the players could overturn the series on the ice. So they go back to the league claiming there’s no way the raiders could win the game with WH #13 on the ice. Except they lost the next game without him on the ice.

How the mighty have fallen. From a team that could walk on water, now going to the backroom for a second chance.

The league didn’t follow its own protocols on suspension documentation and notifications. So the Scheming Ice Raiders saw an opening to get try to wriggle back in a series they lost on the ice so far.
Guest

Re: 2010 GTHL A East

Post by Guest »

Interesting how WH knew the rules about how the SIR coach was suspended the next game but didn’t take the time to look at their own issues. And don’t kid yourself - WH would have gone to the G faster and harder and would have been stomping thier feet more than they are now.

All this hate for the SIR players, 14 year old kids, you should be ashamed of yourselves.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post