Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 4:44 pm What’s telling about the Scheming Ice Raiders drama is that the coaches have no faith the players could overturn the series on the ice. So they go back to the league claiming there’s no way the raiders could win the game with WH #13 on the ice. Except they lost the next game without him on the ice.

How the mighty have fallen. From a team that could walk on water, now going to the backroom for a second chance.

The league didn’t follow its own protocols on suspension documentation and notifications. So the Scheming Ice Raiders saw an opening to get try to wriggle back in a series they lost on the ice so far.

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 5:03 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 4:44 pm What’s telling about the Scheming Ice Raiders drama is that the coaches have no faith the players could overturn the series on the ice. So they go back to the league claiming there’s no way the raiders could win the game with WH #13 on the ice. Except they lost the next game without him on the ice.

How the mighty have fallen. From a team that could walk on water, now going to the backroom for a second chance.

The league didn’t follow its own protocols on suspension documentation and notifications. So the Scheming Ice Raiders saw an opening to get try to wriggle back in a series they lost on the ice so far.

This sounds to me like the WH coach is mad. Ignorance to the rules is not a defense. Everyone knows that every 5 minute major and game ejection carries a suspension. Brush up on your rule book toys.

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 5:12 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 5:03 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 4:44 pm What’s telling about the Scheming Ice Raiders drama is that the coaches have no faith the players could overturn the series on the ice. So they go back to the league claiming there’s no way the raiders could win the game with WH #13 on the ice. Except they lost the next game without him on the ice.

How the mighty have fallen. From a team that could walk on water, now going to the backroom for a second chance.

The league didn’t follow its own protocols on suspension documentation and notifications. So the Scheming Ice Raiders saw an opening to get try to wriggle back in a series they lost on the ice so far.

This sounds to me like the WH coach is mad. Ignorance to the rules is not a defense. Everyone knows that every 5 minute major and game ejection carries a suspension. Brush up on your rule book toys.

The SIR coach is Muskoka buddies with Scott Oakman....that should tell you everything.

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 5:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 5:12 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 5:03 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 4:44 pm What’s telling about the Scheming Ice Raiders drama is that the coaches have no faith the players could overturn the series on the ice. So they go back to the league claiming there’s no way the raiders could win the game with WH #13 on the ice. Except they lost the next game without him on the ice.

How the mighty have fallen. From a team that could walk on water, now going to the backroom for a second chance.

The league didn’t follow its own protocols on suspension documentation and notifications. So the Scheming Ice Raiders saw an opening to get try to wriggle back in a series they lost on the ice so far.

This sounds to me like the WH coach is mad. Ignorance to the rules is not a defense. Everyone knows that every 5 minute major and game ejection carries a suspension. Brush up on your rule book toys.

The SIR coach is Muskoka buddies with Scott Oakman....that should tell you everything.

Why are we not surprised by this. WH vs EVERYONE!

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 4:11 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 3:23 pm Points still listed at 4-2, but if you click on the series game 2 is gone, showing 1 win a piece. Me thinks the drama is just starting!

The GTHL made an error on game sheet #1 that indicated 1 player suspension versus 2. While WH unaware of any wrongdoing they played 1 of those kids in game 2. The scheming ice raiders took note of this. Then they held onto this info, confronted WH with it 20 mins before game 3, and said if they sat the kid in question for game 3 that they wouldn’t protest game 2. WH took their word for it and agreed to sit the player even though they were unsure if he was even suspended. They didn’t have enough time to check with league on protocols, so they took less risky route and sat kid Clearly schemers didn’t expect WH to win game 3.
So, as low life’s do, they reneged on their word, and protested WH win in game 2. Too afraid of the 8th place team I guess. Classless, spineless.
If it had been a clear fault by west hill, and rules were broken, the game would have easily been reversed and the Schemers would be up 4-2 right now, even though they lost game 2 on ice. But it’s not the case. GTHL muddied this too much that they are simply replaying game 2 tonight. Making it as if game 2 never happened. But screen shots live forever. As do reputations. The kids know the reality, the coaches know the truth, and everybody else probably will too.

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 5:53 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 4:11 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 3:23 pm Points still listed at 4-2, but if you click on the series game 2 is gone, showing 1 win a piece. Me thinks the drama is just starting!

The GTHL made an error on game sheet #1 that indicated 1 player suspension versus 2. While WH unaware of any wrongdoing they played 1 of those kids in game 2. The scheming ice raiders took note of this. Then they held onto this info, confronted WH with it 20 mins before game 3, and said if they sat the kid in question for game 3 that they wouldn’t protest game 2. WH took their word for it and agreed to sit the player even though they were unsure if he was even suspended. They didn’t have enough time to check with league on protocols, so they took less risky route and sat kid Clearly schemers didn’t expect WH to win game 3.
So, as low life’s do, they reneged on their word, and protested WH win in game 2. Too afraid of the 8th place team I guess. Classless, spineless.
If it had been a clear fault by west hill, and rules were broken, the game would have easily been reversed and the Schemers would be up 4-2 right now, even though they lost game 2 on ice. But it’s not the case. GTHL muddied this too much that they are simply replaying game 2 tonight. Making it as if game 2 never happened. But screen shots live forever. As do reputations. The kids know the reality, the coaches know the truth, and everybody else probably will too.

I’m honestly just trying to figure out what happened here. I’m sorry, but what this person says above makes absolutely no sense. You’re telling me that the SIR coach told the WH coach before game 3 “hey man that kid is suspended and he can’t play” and then the WH coach said “I don’t think so, but I’ll take your word for it!” And then THEY agreed that the kid WON’T play game 3 as long as SIR doesn’t protest game 2, which is a game that the suspended player played in. Huh???? Sorry dude, that makes no sense! That’s not how rules work. The WH coach and SIR coach don’t get to decide this. So a couple things: (A) How did the SIR coach know that a WH player was suspended, but the WH coach didn’t even know this? (B) If SIR wanted the forfeit/win, they could’ve easily just reported it to the G after game 2. Why didn’t they report it to the GTHL to get the win? (C) What would’ve happened if the SIR coach didn’t even tell the WH coach at all? He should’ve just “held onto this information” for longer and let the suspended player play multiple games so that multiple games can be forfeit. (D) Seems like a wild situation for the GTHL to nullify the game and decide to replay it. Not sure I’ve ever seen such a thing!

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 5:53 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 4:11 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 3:23 pm Points still listed at 4-2, but if you click on the series game 2 is gone, showing 1 win a piece. Me thinks the drama is just starting!

The GTHL made an error on game sheet #1 that indicated 1 player suspension versus 2. While WH unaware of any wrongdoing they played 1 of those kids in game 2. The scheming ice raiders took note of this. Then they held onto this info, confronted WH with it 20 mins before game 3, and said if they sat the kid in question for game 3 that they wouldn’t protest game 2. WH took their word for it and agreed to sit the player even though they were unsure if he was even suspended. They didn’t have enough time to check with league on protocols, so they took less risky route and sat kid Clearly schemers didn’t expect WH to win game 3.
So, as low life’s do, they reneged on their word, and protested WH win in game 2. Too afraid of the 8th place team I guess. Classless, spineless.
If it had been a clear fault by west hill, and rules were broken, the game would have easily been reversed and the Schemers would be up 4-2 right now, even though they lost game 2 on ice. But it’s not the case. GTHL muddied this too much that they are simply replaying game 2 tonight. Making it as if game 2 never happened. But screen shots live forever. As do reputations. The kids know the reality, the coaches know the truth, and everybody else probably will too.

I’m honestly just trying to figure out what happened here. I’m sorry, but what this person says above makes absolutely no sense. You’re telling me that the SIR coach told the WH coach before game 3 “hey man that kid is suspended and he can’t play” and then the WH coach said “I don’t think so, but I’ll take your word for it!” And then THEY agreed that the kid WON’T play game 3 as long as SIR doesn’t protest game 2, which is a game that the suspended player played in. Huh???? Sorry dude, that makes no sense! That’s not how rules work. The WH coach and SIR coach don’t get to decide this. So a couple things: (A) How did the SIR coach know that a WH player was suspended, but the WH coach didn’t even know this? (B) If SIR wanted the forfeit/win, they could’ve easily just reported it to the G after game 2. Why didn’t they report it to the GTHL to get the win? (C) What would’ve happened if the SIR coach didn’t even tell the WH coach at all? He should’ve just “held onto this information” for longer and let the suspended player play multiple games so that multiple games can be forfeit. (D) Seems like a wild situation for the GTHL to nullify the game and decide to replay it. Not sure I’ve ever seen such a thing!

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 6:01 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 5:53 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 4:11 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 3:23 pm Points still listed at 4-2, but if you click on the series game 2 is gone, showing 1 win a piece. Me thinks the drama is just starting!

The GTHL made an error on game sheet #1 that indicated 1 player suspension versus 2. While WH unaware of any wrongdoing they played 1 of those kids in game 2. The scheming ice raiders took note of this. Then they held onto this info, confronted WH with it 20 mins before game 3, and said if they sat the kid in question for game 3 that they wouldn’t protest game 2. WH took their word for it and agreed to sit the player even though they were unsure if he was even suspended. They didn’t have enough time to check with league on protocols, so they took less risky route and sat kid Clearly schemers didn’t expect WH to win game 3.
So, as low life’s do, they reneged on their word, and protested WH win in game 2. Too afraid of the 8th place team I guess. Classless, spineless.
If it had been a clear fault by west hill, and rules were broken, the game would have easily been reversed and the Schemers would be up 4-2 right now, even though they lost game 2 on ice. But it’s not the case. GTHL muddied this too much that they are simply replaying game 2 tonight. Making it as if game 2 never happened. But screen shots live forever. As do reputations. The kids know the reality, the coaches know the truth, and everybody else probably will too.

I’m honestly just trying to figure out what happened here. I’m sorry, but what this person says above makes absolutely no sense. You’re telling me that the SIR coach told the WH coach before game 3 “hey man that kid is suspended and he can’t play” and then the WH coach said “I don’t think so, but I’ll take your word for it!” And then THEY agreed that the kid WON’T play game 3 as long as SIR doesn’t protest game 2, which is a game that the suspended player played in. Huh???? Sorry dude, that makes no sense! That’s not how rules work. The WH coach and SIR coach don’t get to decide this. So a couple things: (A) How did the SIR coach know that a WH player was suspended, but the WH coach didn’t even know this? (B) If SIR wanted the forfeit/win, they could’ve easily just reported it to the G after game 2. Why didn’t they report it to the GTHL to get the win? (C) What would’ve happened if the SIR coach didn’t even tell the WH coach at all? He should’ve just “held onto this information” for longer and let the suspended player play multiple games so that multiple games can be forfeit. (D) Seems like a wild situation for the GTHL to nullify the game and decide to replay it. Not sure I’ve ever seen such a thing!

That’s what I’m getting from this too. SIR coach is smarter than WH coach and knew kid was suspended. Or WH coach thought he could get away with it and didn’t. Either way this comes down to WH coach being a f*cking moron, but we always knew that right WH?