2013 GTHL AAA

Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:34 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:26 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:15 am With the bottom 6 RR coming to an end — which teams over achieved and underachieved based on their beginning of year expectation? Obviously none of these bottom 6 teams have a chance in hell of making it past the next RR, but at least the top 2 proved to be the best of the bottom. I think this is a solid reflection of the coaches and the program they put together. First of all, I never thought Reps would be in the bottom 6, and I thought DMF would be. So I’d say the DMF coach did a much better job this season than the Reps coach. Secondly, I thought Markham was gonna be terrible this season. Wrong! They had a great regular season and post season, so good on the Markham coach/program. I thought NYR was gonna be one of the better lower teams, but I guess not. 0 wins in the post season? Ouch. The NYR coach/program must’ve been pretty bad this season. Sens, Rebels, Titans all finished exactly where I thought they would. And now basically all these bottom 6 will be swapping players with each other for next season. Some will move up a spot and some down a bit, but they’ll all be basically the same.
Strange that you didn’t mention TRW? They didn’t win a game last year and they ended up with more wins than DMF this season! TRW - 16 wins, DMF - 15.
SC put on a coaching master class this season, sending notice early on with a 3-1 win over the TM.
I just pulled up this seasons U12 GTHL schedule for TRW and don’t see anywhere that they beat the Marlies. Went on power rankings and same thing there. When did this so called win happen?
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:13 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:34 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:26 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:15 am With the bottom 6 RR coming to an end — which teams over achieved and underachieved based on their beginning of year expectation? Obviously none of these bottom 6 teams have a chance in hell of making it past the next RR, but at least the top 2 proved to be the best of the bottom. I think this is a solid reflection of the coaches and the program they put together. First of all, I never thought Reps would be in the bottom 6, and I thought DMF would be. So I’d say the DMF coach did a much better job this season than the Reps coach. Secondly, I thought Markham was gonna be terrible this season. Wrong! They had a great regular season and post season, so good on the Markham coach/program. I thought NYR was gonna be one of the better lower teams, but I guess not. 0 wins in the post season? Ouch. The NYR coach/program must’ve been pretty bad this season. Sens, Rebels, Titans all finished exactly where I thought they would. And now basically all these bottom 6 will be swapping players with each other for next season. Some will move up a spot and some down a bit, but they’ll all be basically the same.
Strange that you didn’t mention TRW? They didn’t win a game last year and they ended up with more wins than DMF this season! TRW - 16 wins, DMF - 15.
SC put on a coaching master class this season, sending notice early on with a 3-1 win over the TM.
I just pulled up this seasons U12 GTHL schedule for TRW and don’t see anywhere that they beat the Marlies. Went on power rankings and same thing there. When did this so called win happen?
I bet you saw that the Reps beat the Marlies though 🤣
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:34 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:13 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:34 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:26 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:15 am With the bottom 6 RR coming to an end — which teams over achieved and underachieved based on their beginning of year expectation? Obviously none of these bottom 6 teams have a chance in hell of making it past the next RR, but at least the top 2 proved to be the best of the bottom. I think this is a solid reflection of the coaches and the program they put together. First of all, I never thought Reps would be in the bottom 6, and I thought DMF would be. So I’d say the DMF coach did a much better job this season than the Reps coach. Secondly, I thought Markham was gonna be terrible this season. Wrong! They had a great regular season and post season, so good on the Markham coach/program. I thought NYR was gonna be one of the better lower teams, but I guess not. 0 wins in the post season? Ouch. The NYR coach/program must’ve been pretty bad this season. Sens, Rebels, Titans all finished exactly where I thought they would. And now basically all these bottom 6 will be swapping players with each other for next season. Some will move up a spot and some down a bit, but they’ll all be basically the same.
Strange that you didn’t mention TRW? They didn’t win a game last year and they ended up with more wins than DMF this season! TRW - 16 wins, DMF - 15.
SC put on a coaching master class this season, sending notice early on with a 3-1 win over the TM.
I just pulled up this seasons U12 GTHL schedule for TRW and don’t see anywhere that they beat the Marlies. Went on power rankings and same thing there. When did this so called win happen?
I bet you saw that the Reps beat the Marlies though 🤣
SC will take TRW into the top 3 next season,
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 8:26 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:34 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:13 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:34 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:26 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:15 am With the bottom 6 RR coming to an end — which teams over achieved and underachieved based on their beginning of year expectation? Obviously none of these bottom 6 teams have a chance in hell of making it past the next RR, but at least the top 2 proved to be the best of the bottom. I think this is a solid reflection of the coaches and the program they put together. First of all, I never thought Reps would be in the bottom 6, and I thought DMF would be. So I’d say the DMF coach did a much better job this season than the Reps coach. Secondly, I thought Markham was gonna be terrible this season. Wrong! They had a great regular season and post season, so good on the Markham coach/program. I thought NYR was gonna be one of the better lower teams, but I guess not. 0 wins in the post season? Ouch. The NYR coach/program must’ve been pretty bad this season. Sens, Rebels, Titans all finished exactly where I thought they would. And now basically all these bottom 6 will be swapping players with each other for next season. Some will move up a spot and some down a bit, but they’ll all be basically the same.
Strange that you didn’t mention TRW? They didn’t win a game last year and they ended up with more wins than DMF this season! TRW - 16 wins, DMF - 15.
SC put on a coaching master class this season, sending notice early on with a 3-1 win over the TM.
I just pulled up this seasons U12 GTHL schedule for TRW and don’t see anywhere that they beat the Marlies. Went on power rankings and same thing there. When did this so called win happen?
I bet you saw that the Reps beat the Marlies though 🤣
SC will take TRW into the top 3 next season,
You idiots have absolutely no hockey sense or understanding at all. You will be 7th or lower. You are losing too much and replacing them talent similar to your bottom 3 forwards who skate at a AA level.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:26 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:15 am With the bottom 6 RR coming to an end — which teams over achieved and underachieved based on their beginning of year expectation? Obviously none of these bottom 6 teams have a chance in hell of making it past the next RR, but at least the top 2 proved to be the best of the bottom. I think this is a solid reflection of the coaches and the program they put together. First of all, I never thought Reps would be in the bottom 6, and I thought DMF would be. So I’d say the DMF coach did a much better job this season than the Reps coach. Secondly, I thought Markham was gonna be terrible this season. Wrong! They had a great regular season and post season, so good on the Markham coach/program. I thought NYR was gonna be one of the better lower teams, but I guess not. 0 wins in the post season? Ouch. The NYR coach/program must’ve been pretty bad this season. Sens, Rebels, Titans all finished exactly where I thought they would. And now basically all these bottom 6 will be swapping players with each other for next season. Some will move up a spot and some down a bit, but they’ll all be basically the same.
Strange that you didn’t mention TRW? They didn’t win a game last year and they ended up with more wins than DMF this season! TRW - 16 wins, DMF - 15.
The question was about the bottom 6. TRW finished in the top 6, which is where I expected them to land. I would say TRW met expectations this year, in terms of where they were expected to finish at the beginning of the year and where they actually finished.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

[quote=Guest post_id=200598 time=1741346764]
[quote=Guest post_id=200583 time=1741324508]
With the bottom 6 RR coming to an end — which teams over achieved and underachieved based on their beginning of year expectation? Obviously none of these bottom 6 teams have a chance in hell of making it past the next RR, but at least the top 2 proved to be the best of the bottom. I think this is a solid reflection of the coaches and the program they put together. First of all, I never thought Reps would be in the bottom 6, and I thought DMF would be. So I’d say the DMF coach did a much better job this season than the Reps coach. Secondly, I thought Markham was gonna be terrible this season. Wrong! They had a great regular season and post season, so good on the Markham coach/program. I thought NYR was gonna be one of the better lower teams, but I guess not. 0 wins in the post season? Ouch. The NYR coach/program must’ve been pretty bad this season. Sens, Rebels, Titans all finished exactly where I thought they would. And now basically all these bottom 6 will be swapping players with each other for next season. Some will move up a spot and some down a bit, but they’ll all be basically the same.
[/quote]

Strange that you didn’t mention TRW? They didn’t win a game last year and they ended up with more wins than DMF this season! TRW - 16 wins, DMF - 15.
[/quote]
I'm not sure why this fact keeps getting brought up - we all know the TRW only won a game last year and not many the year before. But this was a complete overhaul jersey transfer, taking Sens kids, the non-parent coaching staff, and mixing in new kids. Achievement for that team is how they did vs the prior year's Sens team... which stayed status quo at 6th place with 32 pts instead of 30 pts in the standings. So that's their achievement. +2 pts on the year. It seems like a lot of noise to land in the same spot.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 9:19 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:26 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:15 am With the bottom 6 RR coming to an end — which teams over achieved and underachieved based on their beginning of year expectation? Obviously none of these bottom 6 teams have a chance in hell of making it past the next RR, but at least the top 2 proved to be the best of the bottom. I think this is a solid reflection of the coaches and the program they put together. First of all, I never thought Reps would be in the bottom 6, and I thought DMF would be. So I’d say the DMF coach did a much better job this season than the Reps coach. Secondly, I thought Markham was gonna be terrible this season. Wrong! They had a great regular season and post season, so good on the Markham coach/program. I thought NYR was gonna be one of the better lower teams, but I guess not. 0 wins in the post season? Ouch. The NYR coach/program must’ve been pretty bad this season. Sens, Rebels, Titans all finished exactly where I thought they would. And now basically all these bottom 6 will be swapping players with each other for next season. Some will move up a spot and some down a bit, but they’ll all be basically the same.
Strange that you didn’t mention TRW? They didn’t win a game last year and they ended up with more wins than DMF this season! TRW - 16 wins, DMF - 15.
I'm not sure why this fact keeps getting brought up - we all know the TRW only won a game last year and not many the year before. But this was a complete overhaul jersey transfer, taking Sens kids, the non-parent coaching staff, and mixing in new kids. Achievement for that team is how they did vs the prior year's Sens team... which stayed status quo at 6th place with 32 pts instead of 30 pts in the standings. So that's their achievement. +2 pts on the year. It seems like a lot of noise to land in the same spot.
So parent head coach in 2023 -> 2024 non-parent head coach but cost $40,000 more for the exact same result? Sounds logical.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:34 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 9:19 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:26 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:15 am With the bottom 6 RR coming to an end — which teams over achieved and underachieved based on their beginning of year expectation? Obviously none of these bottom 6 teams have a chance in hell of making it past the next RR, but at least the top 2 proved to be the best of the bottom. I think this is a solid reflection of the coaches and the program they put together. First of all, I never thought Reps would be in the bottom 6, and I thought DMF would be. So I’d say the DMF coach did a much better job this season than the Reps coach. Secondly, I thought Markham was gonna be terrible this season. Wrong! They had a great regular season and post season, so good on the Markham coach/program. I thought NYR was gonna be one of the better lower teams, but I guess not. 0 wins in the post season? Ouch. The NYR coach/program must’ve been pretty bad this season. Sens, Rebels, Titans all finished exactly where I thought they would. And now basically all these bottom 6 will be swapping players with each other for next season. Some will move up a spot and some down a bit, but they’ll all be basically the same.
Strange that you didn’t mention TRW? They didn’t win a game last year and they ended up with more wins than DMF this season! TRW - 16 wins, DMF - 15.
I'm not sure why this fact keeps getting brought up - we all know the TRW only won a game last year and not many the year before. But this was a complete overhaul jersey transfer, taking Sens kids, the non-parent coaching staff, and mixing in new kids. Achievement for that team is how they did vs the prior year's Sens team... which stayed status quo at 6th place with 32 pts instead of 30 pts in the standings. So that's their achievement. +2 pts on the year. It seems like a lot of noise to land in the same spot.
So parent head coach in 2023 -> 2024 non-parent head coach but cost $40,000 more for the exact same result? Sounds logical.
https://youtu.be/G6jYlqguHXY?si=MSTN_g3IcU8Rqa8K
Minor hockey coach is just for fun. Once you got good players who attracted by jersey, coach can go to Cuba for vacation, the team will still win.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:34 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 9:19 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:26 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:15 am With the bottom 6 RR coming to an end — which teams over achieved and underachieved based on their beginning of year expectation? Obviously none of these bottom 6 teams have a chance in hell of making it past the next RR, but at least the top 2 proved to be the best of the bottom. I think this is a solid reflection of the coaches and the program they put together. First of all, I never thought Reps would be in the bottom 6, and I thought DMF would be. So I’d say the DMF coach did a much better job this season than the Reps coach. Secondly, I thought Markham was gonna be terrible this season. Wrong! They had a great regular season and post season, so good on the Markham coach/program. I thought NYR was gonna be one of the better lower teams, but I guess not. 0 wins in the post season? Ouch. The NYR coach/program must’ve been pretty bad this season. Sens, Rebels, Titans all finished exactly where I thought they would. And now basically all these bottom 6 will be swapping players with each other for next season. Some will move up a spot and some down a bit, but they’ll all be basically the same.
Strange that you didn’t mention TRW? They didn’t win a game last year and they ended up with more wins than DMF this season! TRW - 16 wins, DMF - 15.
I'm not sure why this fact keeps getting brought up - we all know the TRW only won a game last year and not many the year before. But this was a complete overhaul jersey transfer, taking Sens kids, the non-parent coaching staff, and mixing in new kids. Achievement for that team is how they did vs the prior year's Sens team... which stayed status quo at 6th place with 32 pts instead of 30 pts in the standings. So that's their achievement. +2 pts on the year. It seems like a lot of noise to land in the same spot.
So parent head coach in 2023 -> 2024 non-parent head coach but cost $40,000 more for the exact same result? Sounds logical.
There are only 5 former Sens on TRW out of 17 players, it's far from the same team. You're jealous.
Guest

Re: 2013 GTHL AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 11:23 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:34 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 9:19 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:26 am
Guest wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:15 am With the bottom 6 RR coming to an end — which teams over achieved and underachieved based on their beginning of year expectation? Obviously none of these bottom 6 teams have a chance in hell of making it past the next RR, but at least the top 2 proved to be the best of the bottom. I think this is a solid reflection of the coaches and the program they put together. First of all, I never thought Reps would be in the bottom 6, and I thought DMF would be. So I’d say the DMF coach did a much better job this season than the Reps coach. Secondly, I thought Markham was gonna be terrible this season. Wrong! They had a great regular season and post season, so good on the Markham coach/program. I thought NYR was gonna be one of the better lower teams, but I guess not. 0 wins in the post season? Ouch. The NYR coach/program must’ve been pretty bad this season. Sens, Rebels, Titans all finished exactly where I thought they would. And now basically all these bottom 6 will be swapping players with each other for next season. Some will move up a spot and some down a bit, but they’ll all be basically the same.
Strange that you didn’t mention TRW? They didn’t win a game last year and they ended up with more wins than DMF this season! TRW - 16 wins, DMF - 15.
I'm not sure why this fact keeps getting brought up - we all know the TRW only won a game last year and not many the year before. But this was a complete overhaul jersey transfer, taking Sens kids, the non-parent coaching staff, and mixing in new kids. Achievement for that team is how they did vs the prior year's Sens team... which stayed status quo at 6th place with 32 pts instead of 30 pts in the standings. So that's their achievement. +2 pts on the year. It seems like a lot of noise to land in the same spot.
So parent head coach in 2023 -> 2024 non-parent head coach but cost $40,000 more for the exact same result? Sounds logical.
There are only 5 former Sens on TRW out of 17 players, it's far from the same team. You're jealous.
Hamburglar - count again! At least 7.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post