Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:50 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:43 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:00 pm

For full context, if you are into sports science, you should read this -https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/the ... y%20system.

This is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.

There we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.

The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!

This guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.

Despite your superior intellect, you are not fooling anyone replying to your own posts. My dog can tell which hand his treat is in 84.37% of the time and it doesn’t make him a genius.

When you’re ready to get real, just post your kids name here and ask all the Hockey dads to let you know if your kid has got it or not. If they can remain anonymous, you’ll get the real feedback you’re hoping to get by digging through BS online studies to confirm your bias that your kid has a chance.

Did not self reply to anything…you readily jumped to thinking you have figured it out, unfortunately your mental health is suffering as a result!

And for the record I am not talking about my kid, he is done hockey. I am talking about bettering the process of developing players and having the sport grow with the success rate of athletes funnelling through the system.

It seems odd you would fight something that makes Canadian hockey better…… but I guess odd and conspiracies is the new world order isn’t it!

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:50 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:43 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:00 pm

For full context, if you are into sports science, you should read this -https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/the ... y%20system.

This is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.

There we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.

The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!

This guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.

Despite your superior intellect, you are not fooling anyone replying to your own posts. My dog can tell which hand his treat is in 84.37% of the time and it doesn’t make him a genius.

When you’re ready to get real, just post your kids name here and ask all the Hockey dads to let you know if your kid has got it or not. If they can remain anonymous, you’ll get the real feedback you’re hoping to get by digging through BS online studies to confirm your bias that your kid has a chance.

Did not self reply to anything…you readily jumped to thinking you have figured it out, unfortunately your mental health is suffering as a result!

And for the record I am not talking about my kid, he is done hockey. I am talking about bettering the process of developing players and having the sport grow with the success rate of athletes funnelling through the system.

It seems odd you would fight something that makes Canadian hockey better…… but I guess odd and conspiracies is the new world order isn’t it!

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 10:02 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 5:00 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:43 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pm

This is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.

There we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.

The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!

This guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.

Despite your superior intellect, you are not fooling anyone replying to your own posts. My dog can tell which hand his treat is in 84.37% of the time and it doesn’t make him a genius.

When you’re ready to get real, just post your kids name here and ask all the Hockey dads to let you know if your kid has got it or not. If they can remain anonymous, you’ll get the real feedback you’re hoping to get by digging through BS online studies to confirm your bias that your kid has a chance.

Out of curiosity, why do you think anonymous hockey dads would possess any sort of credentials on talent identification? This is exactly the issue with hockey in Canada, volunteer coaches and hockey parents have zero education, experience or skill in TI.

Are you suggesting that none of the hockey dads in McDavids cohort knew he was going to be star?

If your pseudoscience predictor is accurate, why don’t you tell us who the stars will be 3 years from now? Why withhold this pertinent information that will confirm you intellectual superiority?

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 10:12 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:50 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:43 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pm

This is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.

There we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.

The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!

This guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.

Despite your superior intellect, you are not fooling anyone replying to your own posts. My dog can tell which hand his treat is in 84.37% of the time and it doesn’t make him a genius.

When you’re ready to get real, just post your kids name here and ask all the Hockey dads to let you know if your kid has got it or not. If they can remain anonymous, you’ll get the real feedback you’re hoping to get by digging through BS online studies to confirm your bias that your kid has a chance.

Did not self reply to anything…you readily jumped to thinking you have figured it out, unfortunately your mental health is suffering as a result!

And for the record I am not talking about my kid, he is done hockey. I am talking about bettering the process of developing players and having the sport grow with the success rate of athletes funnelling through the system.

It seems odd you would fight something that makes Canadian hockey better…… but I guess odd and conspiracies is the new world order isn’t it!

What conspiracy are you referring to? That the Covid vaccine stops transmission? Join us in 2025 where we all understand the vaccine never stopped transmission. Just think about it critically for a short second. You were vaccinated and you still got Covid. You were duped then because you couldn’t see what was happening I the real world, blinded by erroneous articles and now you are on a random hockey page for an age group that your kid does not play in, again pretending reality is not real because you read an article drafted by the “experts”. If I send you an article stating the vaccine made you dumb would you believe it?

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 10:18 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 10:12 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:50 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:43 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pm

There we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.

The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!

This guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.

Despite your superior intellect, you are not fooling anyone replying to your own posts. My dog can tell which hand his treat is in 84.37% of the time and it doesn’t make him a genius.

When you’re ready to get real, just post your kids name here and ask all the Hockey dads to let you know if your kid has got it or not. If they can remain anonymous, you’ll get the real feedback you’re hoping to get by digging through BS online studies to confirm your bias that your kid has a chance.

Did not self reply to anything…you readily jumped to thinking you have figured it out, unfortunately your mental health is suffering as a result!

And for the record I am not talking about my kid, he is done hockey. I am talking about bettering the process of developing players and having the sport grow with the success rate of athletes funnelling through the system.

It seems odd you would fight something that makes Canadian hockey better…… but I guess odd and conspiracies is the new world order isn’t it!

What conspiracy are you referring to? That the Covid vaccine stops transmission? Join us in 2025 where we all understand the vaccine never stopped transmission. Just think about it critically for a short second. You were vaccinated and you still got Covid. You were duped then because you couldn’t see what was happening I the real world, blinded by erroneous articles and now you are on a random hockey page for an age group that your kid does not play in, again pretending reality is not real because you read an article drafted by the “experts”. If I send you an article stating the vaccine made you dumb would you believe it?

Never got Covid, genetically superior bud. That’s why you are so angry:)!

Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 12:47 am If I am following all this nonsense than basically all the little water bugs should play water bug division for anyone 5’4 and smaller

Intermediate not quite ready to play division 5’4-5’8

Real hockey division 5’8 and taller and then we would actually be developing these kids.

Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:21 am

Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 12:47 am If I am following all this nonsense than basically all the little water bugs should play water bug division for anyone 5’4 and smaller

Intermediate not quite ready to play division 5’4-5’8

Real hockey division 5’8 and taller and then we would actually be developing these kids.

If they did a tournament each year they would bio band the teams. It would be based on maturation and not height like you mention above. You could have 5’3 kid that is fully grown in the top division! And you could have a 5’11 kid that is going to be 6’7 in the lowest division


You get it?

Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:21 am

Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 12:47 am If I am following all this nonsense than basically all the little water bugs should play water bug division for anyone 5’4 and smaller

Intermediate not quite ready to play division 5’4-5’8

Real hockey division 5’8 and taller and then we would actually be developing these kids.

If they did a tournament each year they would bio band the teams. It would be based on maturation and not height like you mention above. You could have 5’3 kid that is fully grown in the top division! And you could have a 5’11 kid that is going to be 6’7 in the lowest division


You get it?

Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 9:28 am

Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:21 am

Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 12:47 am If I am following all this nonsense than basically all the little water bugs should play water bug division for anyone 5’4 and smaller

Intermediate not quite ready to play division 5’4-5’8

Real hockey division 5’8 and taller and then we would actually be developing these kids.

If they did a tournament each year they would bio band the teams. It would be based on maturation and not height like you mention above. You could have 5’3 kid that is fully grown in the top division! And you could have a 5’11 kid that is going to be 6’7 in the lowest division


You get it?