Centennial is WH's home rink. It wasn't a neutral site, correct.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:52 pmSIR baits teams into retaliating. Sounds like what the WH kid was ugly. But if SIR hadn't run their goalie a couple minutes earlier, that ugly hit never happens. SIR has been the instigator enough times against a bunch of different teams we can call it a strategy. Maybe it's not the coach telling the kids to run goalies. But it's obvious he's not telling them NOT to run goalies. Just like other coaches aren't telling their kids to retaliate. But they're not telling them NOT to retaliate. There are different ways to approach the game of hockey. Stuff we complain about here goes on in AAA and AA every night and no one complains. But we signed up for NON-CONTACT hockey for our kids. And if SIR wants to play a tough, intimidating style they should move to AA.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:10 pm SIR had nothing to do with the West Hill kid driving an sir kid into the boards head first with less than a minute left in the game. Getting a five-game suspension. That doesn't take away from the goalie and soon that shouldn't have happened. But let's call a spade a spade.
And I stand by what I said earlier. This doesn't just happen when teams play SIR. It happens when teams play SIR in Scarborough. The VRE game was at Don Montgomery. The LF and WH games were both at Scarborough Centennial. If I'm FH or TA, I'm not taking my kids to play Scarborough anywhere that isn't a neutral site.
2010 GTHL A East
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:52 pmSIR baits teams into retaliating. Sounds like what the WH kid was ugly. But if SIR hadn't run their goalie a couple minutes earlier, that ugly hit never happens. SIR has been the instigator enough times against a bunch of different teams we can call it a strategy. Maybe it's not the coach telling the kids to run goalies. But it's obvious he's not telling them NOT to run goalies. Just like other coaches aren't telling their kids to retaliate. But they're not telling them NOT to retaliate. There are different ways to approach the game of hockey. Stuff we complain about here goes on in AAA and AA every night and no one complains. But we signed up for NON-CONTACT hockey for our kids. And if SIR wants to play a tough, intimidating style they should move to AA.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:10 pm SIR had nothing to do with the West Hill kid driving an sir kid into the boards head first with less than a minute left in the game. Getting a five-game suspension. That doesn't take away from the goalie and soon that shouldn't have happened. But let's call a spade a spade.
And I stand by what I said earlier. This doesn't just happen when teams play SIR. It happens when teams play SIR in Scarborough. The VRE game was at Don Montgomery. The LF and WH games were both at Scarborough Centennial. If I'm FH or TA, I'm not taking my kids to play Scarborough anywhere that isn't a neutral site.
If you believe a GTHL ref from anywhere in the GTA, is biased in favour of any team, you’re an idiot and don’t know how this league and their refs work. They aren’t picking guys that live in that neighborhood or have a tie to that association. Refs are divided into groups, east and west, then divided by skill level, best ref AAA then the others do AA/A. There is no bias, your a moron. Good luck telling a coach your not bringing Jonny to play in Scarborough.
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Debatable on the first two, their antics on the ice demonstrate otherwise, but you hit the nail on the head with the parents. Worst in the G.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:53 pmGood kids. Goon coaches. Classless parents.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:34 pmThanks for making my point with fewer words.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:06 pmSo STFU and don’t come to Scarborough.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:52 pmSIR baits teams into retaliating. Sounds like what the WH kid was ugly. But if SIR hadn't run their goalie a couple minutes earlier, that ugly hit never happens. SIR has been the instigator enough times against a bunch of different teams we can call it a strategy. Maybe it's not the coach telling the kids to run goalies. But it's obvious he's not telling them NOT to run goalies. Just like other coaches aren't telling their kids to retaliate. But they're not telling them NOT to retaliate. There are different ways to approach the game of hockey. Stuff we complain about here goes on in AAA and AA every night and no one complains. But we signed up for NON-CONTACT hockey for our kids. And if SIR wants to play a tough, intimidating style they should move to AA.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:10 pm SIR had nothing to do with the West Hill kid driving an sir kid into the boards head first with less than a minute left in the game. Getting a five-game suspension. That doesn't take away from the goalie and soon that shouldn't have happened. But let's call a spade a spade.
And I stand by what I said earlier. This doesn't just happen when teams play SIR. It happens when teams play SIR in Scarborough. The VRE game was at Don Montgomery. The LF and WH games were both at Scarborough Centennial. If I'm FH or TA, I'm not taking my kids to play Scarborough anywhere that isn't a neutral site.
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
That's an ignorant comment considering last night the parents were all quiet. The only one yelling and screaming was a West Hill mom running up and down the glass screaming at the kids on the ice when it was her son that received a five-game suspension for trying to injure an SIR kid. Also WH had two suspensions.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:15 pmDebatable on the first two, their antics on the ice demonstrate otherwise, but you hit the nail on the head with the parents. Worst in the G.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:53 pmGood kids. Goon coaches. Classless parents.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:34 pmThanks for making my point with fewer words.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:06 pmSo STFU and don’t come to Scarborough.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:52 pmSIR baits teams into retaliating. Sounds like what the WH kid was ugly. But if SIR hadn't run their goalie a couple minutes earlier, that ugly hit never happens. SIR has been the instigator enough times against a bunch of different teams we can call it a strategy. Maybe it's not the coach telling the kids to run goalies. But it's obvious he's not telling them NOT to run goalies. Just like other coaches aren't telling their kids to retaliate. But they're not telling them NOT to retaliate. There are different ways to approach the game of hockey. Stuff we complain about here goes on in AAA and AA every night and no one complains. But we signed up for NON-CONTACT hockey for our kids. And if SIR wants to play a tough, intimidating style they should move to AA.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:10 pm SIR had nothing to do with the West Hill kid driving an sir kid into the boards head first with less than a minute left in the game. Getting a five-game suspension. That doesn't take away from the goalie and soon that shouldn't have happened. But let's call a spade a spade.
And I stand by what I said earlier. This doesn't just happen when teams play SIR. It happens when teams play SIR in Scarborough. The VRE game was at Don Montgomery. The LF and WH games were both at Scarborough Centennial. If I'm FH or TA, I'm not taking my kids to play Scarborough anywhere that isn't a neutral site.
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Friday night I can get you a good deal on ticketsGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:20 pm Where and and when is game 2? And how much are tickets going for?
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Friday Leaside memorial, 9pm!! I’m scalping front row behind the penalty box for 200 a ticket. Have 6 for saleGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:20 pm Where and and when is game 2? And how much are tickets going for?
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Are you “baiting” us? I hope not, because in the world you live in, we should retaliate and take no responsibility for our actions!!!Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:15 pmDebatable on the first two, their antics on the ice demonstrate otherwise, but you hit the nail on the head with the parents. Worst in the G.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:53 pmGood kids. Goon coaches. Classless parents.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:34 pmThanks for making my point with fewer words.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:06 pmSo STFU and don’t come to Scarborough.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:52 pmSIR baits teams into retaliating. Sounds like what the WH kid was ugly. But if SIR hadn't run their goalie a couple minutes earlier, that ugly hit never happens. SIR has been the instigator enough times against a bunch of different teams we can call it a strategy. Maybe it's not the coach telling the kids to run goalies. But it's obvious he's not telling them NOT to run goalies. Just like other coaches aren't telling their kids to retaliate. But they're not telling them NOT to retaliate. There are different ways to approach the game of hockey. Stuff we complain about here goes on in AAA and AA every night and no one complains. But we signed up for NON-CONTACT hockey for our kids. And if SIR wants to play a tough, intimidating style they should move to AA.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:10 pm SIR had nothing to do with the West Hill kid driving an sir kid into the boards head first with less than a minute left in the game. Getting a five-game suspension. That doesn't take away from the goalie and soon that shouldn't have happened. But let's call a spade a spade.
And I stand by what I said earlier. This doesn't just happen when teams play SIR. It happens when teams play SIR in Scarborough. The VRE game was at Don Montgomery. The LF and WH games were both at Scarborough Centennial. If I'm FH or TA, I'm not taking my kids to play Scarborough anywhere that isn't a neutral site.
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:18 pmThat's an ignorant comment considering last night the parents were all quiet. The only one yelling and screaming was a West Hill mom running up and down the glass screaming at the kids on the ice when it was her son that received a five-game suspension for trying to injure an SIR kid. Also WH had two suspensions.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:15 pmDebatable on the first two, their antics on the ice demonstrate otherwise, but you hit the nail on the head with the parents. Worst in the G.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:53 pmGood kids. Goon coaches. Classless parents.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:34 pmThanks for making my point with fewer words.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:06 pmSo STFU and don’t come to Scarborough.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 2:52 pm
SIR baits teams into retaliating. Sounds like what the WH kid was ugly. But if SIR hadn't run their goalie a couple minutes earlier, that ugly hit never happens. SIR has been the instigator enough times against a bunch of different teams we can call it a strategy. Maybe it's not the coach telling the kids to run goalies. But it's obvious he's not telling them NOT to run goalies. Just like other coaches aren't telling their kids to retaliate. But they're not telling them NOT to retaliate. There are different ways to approach the game of hockey. Stuff we complain about here goes on in AAA and AA every night and no one complains. But we signed up for NON-CONTACT hockey for our kids. And if SIR wants to play a tough, intimidating style they should move to AA.
And I stand by what I said earlier. This doesn't just happen when teams play SIR. It happens when teams play SIR in Scarborough. The VRE game was at Don Montgomery. The LF and WH games were both at Scarborough Centennial. If I'm FH or TA, I'm not taking my kids to play Scarborough anywhere that isn't a neutral site.
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
And this is the continual stupidity of parents that are not part of either team. Nothing is going to happen because the two teams will show up and play a hockey game, and that is all.
Yesterdays game was indeed not our brightest showing, the actions of our players should have not taken place as the game was technically over and there was no bad blood to feed off of. It was embarrassing and understandably a bad reflection on the presumed judgement on our team all year. Nobody wants to see any kid hurt playing hockey, nobody wants to see cheap shots, but unfortunately it happens, when we as kids played hockey, and today amongst all teams.
The Scarborough comments are incredibly ignorant and hold zero truth, and if any of the posters can actually quantify their comments, I would be very impressed and will extend apologies.
This team has gone from worst to first in two years, without adding AA players, without poaching, by developing the core and adding pieces from lower ranked A teams, they have done things the right way. Do they have kids that do stupid shit during games, they sure do, please show me one team in our division that does not? There is envy towards the team, there has to be, any parent would want their kid to be a part of a team that did a 360 in two years...its admirable.
Previous games, other teams instigated and started the shit and comments, last night, it was indeed us. How come nobody on WH is owning up to their kid who at the end of the game slammed, with force, our kid from behind with 11 seconds left...surely there coach is just as a presumed idiot as SIRs?
The game is over, we all hope the kid is OK who got hurt by what wasn't a dirty play, just bad luck. The kids who did the stupid actions are suspended, end of story...everyone move on...not the first and definitely not the last time a GTHL game is going to see kids do stupid things.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post