You're not paying attention.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 8:42 amAgree MNS were the better team. However the bench was shortened by the middle of the second. 10 or 19 are there only real players. 4 can skate but doesn’t make anything happen. Just dipsy doodles until he loses the puck.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Mar 02, 2025 3:11 pmI can’t speak to the first game but I did think NS was the better team in the second.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Mar 02, 2025 2:50 pmYou watch too much live barn and your hate of Vaughan is showing.
Their defencemen are very offensive minded which helps the team a lot. Their goalie was alright.
The Rangers looked fine and I think they can and will surprise some of the teams in the round robin. It feels like they will make it thru.
I now understand the Disney on Ice joke, that would drive me bananas as the coach. Boy can skate for sure but figure 8s don’t usually have a role in hockey.
I don’t agree with shortening bench so early. Play as a team win/lose as one as well, at this age anyways. Last 3 to 5 mins go for the gold. But not half way through the game.
Their D controls the game, the tall line of 9/15 and then Disney on Ice kid # 4 who I'm not certain understands the game of hockey but can skate.
Their F are weak so 10/19 look good compared.
And yes, the coach plays those 5 only in the third, that's between him and the parents, who I guess are okay with it so long as their kid gets some trophy.