I’m guessing you’re referring to the game against NM. The loss to TNT was definitely the defense’s fault.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 1:11 pmGuest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:53 pmHey M, you should tell the D coach not to put that D pair on the ice when your kid is out there.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:48 pmHe went with 7 D because god forbid his kid misses a shift. Calling up an AP and playing 7 D. Great coaching! It's a joke at this point. This just shows how unaware he is about where his kid should fit in a game like that. Especially bc he had 2 kids moved back to D who are forwards.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:41 pmYou’ve lost a lot of games because you refuse to let your house league kid miss even a single shift!Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:04 pm Is the TNT squad really that strong? They’re trailing you in the standings. Also, you should have won that game if you knew how to coach. Putting that D pair and your kid on the ice together isn’t a winning strategy.
Against Newmarket, you went with seven defensemen and nine forwards, and the AP was your best player. Get it together, Coach.
That game wasn't the Ds fault.
But either way, M shouldn’t have had your three weakest players on the ice at the same time.
[/quote]
Nah. Not their fault. 2 goals were scored on a 2 on 1. Where were the other 4 players?
M was out coached in the defensive zone.
Three weakest players? I don't think many would agree with you there.
[/quote]
This is an interesting take. I think it’s clear that The D pair and his kid are the three weakest players on the team. But at least we can all agree that the team was outcoached.