2011 AAA

[Guest]

What a comeback by VK

What happened?

VK sat the irrelevants

I bet those kids are feeling great about themselves today. Atleast CS got his "mean nothing" season trophy.

I bet CM is feeling great today too, knowing he’ll never win one of those now that JB fired his ass.

CM's older brother AM got fired from coaching a WSI team going to Balzano this summer too because they couldn't fill a roster - nobody wanted to play for the guy. I think they had 3 kids sign up in 12 weeks and fired him, then filled the roster within the next 2 weeks.

CM and his family are just losers who need to go away. Glad we won't have to see his greasy ass in our age group any more. He just wasn't good enough.

[Guest]

At this point, finishing U14 AAA and transitioning to U15 AAA you need ask yourself a question - Why is my kid still playing? There are a few answers
1) He wants to have fun, and after U16 its beerleagues
- then move to the midpack team where you will win some games, have like minded friends and win some mid-pack tourneys to remember (may be even some summer Canlan AA trouney - but who cares, for memories a medal is medal). The main point is - stop being obsessed about coaches, playing time, stats etc. And statistically, that's where most will end ...
2) He wants to play OHL and then have an shot at NHL draft or NCAA. Then you can honeslty answer yourself what makes a player making a draft. Being on a top team, able to win at critical times, score at critical games (not when you run-time someone in the middle of 2nd) contributes a lot to that. U16 Gthl has 2 stud teams - DMF and TT and 3 runners ups (JRC, VK and TM) in comparison to U14 (with 2 stud teams and 1 runner up) - AND these two top teams have 1/3 of the first two rounds of draft (20 players) and the 3 runners up have another third (another 20 players).
It is very likely (based on both stats, team composition, future selections and where the kids from other teams are right now) that the current U14 top teams will take the 50% of the draft in two years. For sure, a kid from Elgin may go under #1 and a kid from COW may go under #3, but its the numbers game in the end....
- So if you want to be there - get on a top team and try to fight for every second of ice you can get, and if you are not big enough, compensate with skill, grit and iq. Yes, you have to be liked by coach as well. So if you dont get that kind of treatment - consider your options - time is ticking.
3) You are certain that your kid is a 'late bloomer' and want to invest in him so he becomes a spuerstar when he is 20. Its possible, and there lots of examples like that - "pavol datsuk" is the one I like
- then dont worry about the team at all. Let him play whenever, train and hope for the best (and plan to fund it for another 6 years) - but be prepared for the outcome of echl training camp and then a stint in the second french division, where the pay is a bowl of soup and a very nice baget.

But in any case, stop complaining about top 3 orgs and the coaching. All three are different and good and have different objectives:
1) VK needs to win, to have as many players at draft as possible so his resume is built up and he can move up in the world
2) JRC needs to have players who are paying the fees at his school and winning is very important but comes second after that objectives
3) TM just needs to be in top 3 to keep reputation

You figured it out here…lol. Cookie cutter and you figured out the recipe. The kid playing on VK has aspirations to play in the show and the kid playing on the Reps is a future beer leaguer aspriration. I’ll bet on 99% of this 2011 age group in this chat will be in the beer league by the time they’re 22. Stats don’t lie. Enjoy the ride it’s almost over. Let the kids have fun.

True enough. There will be a very very small percentage that play beyond 22 years of age. Another small percentage will play competitively after U16. It’s about prioritizing life and career ambitions. Some will stretch it out as long as they can, some will understand that hockey is not going to pay the bills for them so getting ahead in the real world might be a better option. There is no wrong answer and each kid/family has the right to do their own thing. For the majority, competitive hockey is over after U16. Enjoy the ride and support all the kids. It goes by too fast!

Too many delusional parents ruin it for everybody else. Kids are usually fine after games with coaches decisions and parents ruin their heads in car rides and home time conversations with other delusional parents. Kids then enter rinks with the same toxic attitudes from their parents. It happens at every age and every level. We forget it’s a game and these kids are lucky enough to be playing at the highest level. No one likes to see their child upset and we need to realize parents are the main reason for ruining the greatest game on earth they have the privilege to play. If 99% don’t make a living out of this game why do parents contribute to creating a toxic environment in a game we all love?

That is super easy to figure it out....the toxic environment is from the creation of an UNFAIR SYSTEM that rewards early maturation and corruption (kick backs). Most importantly, and this is the hardest part for coaches to understand...at this stage of Growth and Development (Learn to Train - LTAD)...THE COACHES DON"T KNOW WHICH KIDS ARE TALENTED YET! They are just seeing early maturation, and playing the men so they can WIN!

All the studies show this, yet ALL THE COACHES (99% uneducated) think they have it all figured out with Talent Identification. So the answer is simple...just make it fair for everyone to succeed at this stage of development! And the question back to you is ----Why is this so hard to understand? Is it culture? Is it ego? Is it lack of education? Is it money, and they don't care? All of them?

Is it ironic that the 3 kids shorter then CS on VK, do not get to play?

Your kid wouldn’t play either if he even could make that team.

[Guest]

What a comeback by VK

What happened?

VK sat the irrelevants

I bet those kids are feeling great about themselves today. Atleast CS got his "mean nothing" season trophy.

I bet CM is feeling great today too, knowing he’ll never win one of those now that JB fired his ass.

CM's older brother AM got fired from coaching a WSI team going to Balzano this summer too because they couldn't fill a roster - nobody wanted to play for the guy. I think they had 3 kids sign up in 12 weeks and fired him, then filled the roster within the next 2 weeks.

CM and his family are just losers who need to go away. Glad we won't have to see his greasy ass in our age group any more. He just wasn't good enough.

CM still has his 2013’s he’ll fine if he learns from his mistakes he made with the 2011’s. He needs to grow as an adult and not get owned by dads. Hes out and there’s new nuts to be licked coming in.

[Guest]

Can’t win as a coach. Shorten the bench and you’re mean, don’t shorten the bench and you’re controlled by parents. Don’t have the stones, etc

What team doesn’t shorten the bench in big games?

CM was the only coach TM had

[Guest]

At this point, finishing U14 AAA and transitioning to U15 AAA you need ask yourself a question - Why is my kid still playing? There are a few answers
1) He wants to have fun, and after U16 its beerleagues
- then move to the midpack team where you will win some games, have like minded friends and win some mid-pack tourneys to remember (may be even some summer Canlan AA trouney - but who cares, for memories a medal is medal). The main point is - stop being obsessed about coaches, playing time, stats etc. And statistically, that's where most will end ...
2) He wants to play OHL and then have an shot at NHL draft or NCAA. Then you can honeslty answer yourself what makes a player making a draft. Being on a top team, able to win at critical times, score at critical games (not when you run-time someone in the middle of 2nd) contributes a lot to that. U16 Gthl has 2 stud teams - DMF and TT and 3 runners ups (JRC, VK and TM) in comparison to U14 (with 2 stud teams and 1 runner up) - AND these two top teams have 1/3 of the first two rounds of draft (20 players) and the 3 runners up have another third (another 20 players).
It is very likely (based on both stats, team composition, future selections and where the kids from other teams are right now) that the current U14 top teams will take the 50% of the draft in two years. For sure, a kid from Elgin may go under #1 and a kid from COW may go under #3, but its the numbers game in the end....
- So if you want to be there - get on a top team and try to fight for every second of ice you can get, and if you are not big enough, compensate with skill, grit and iq. Yes, you have to be liked by coach as well. So if you dont get that kind of treatment - consider your options - time is ticking.
3) You are certain that your kid is a 'late bloomer' and want to invest in him so he becomes a spuerstar when he is 20. Its possible, and there lots of examples like that - "pavol datsuk" is the one I like
- then dont worry about the team at all. Let him play whenever, train and hope for the best (and plan to fund it for another 6 years) - but be prepared for the outcome of echl training camp and then a stint in the second french division, where the pay is a bowl of soup and a very nice baget.

But in any case, stop complaining about top 3 orgs and the coaching. All three are different and good and have different objectives:
1) VK needs to win, to have as many players at draft as possible so his resume is built up and he can move up in the world
2) JRC needs to have players who are paying the fees at his school and winning is very important but comes second after that objectives
3) TM just needs to be in top 3 to keep reputation

You figured it out here…lol. Cookie cutter and you figured out the recipe. The kid playing on VK has aspirations to play in the show and the kid playing on the Reps is a future beer leaguer aspriration. I’ll bet on 99% of this 2011 age group in this chat will be in the beer league by the time they’re 22. Stats don’t lie. Enjoy the ride it’s almost over. Let the kids have fun.

True enough. There will be a very very small percentage that play beyond 22 years of age. Another small percentage will play competitively after U16. It’s about prioritizing life and career ambitions. Some will stretch it out as long as they can, some will understand that hockey is not going to pay the bills for them so getting ahead in the real world might be a better option. There is no wrong answer and each kid/family has the right to do their own thing. For the majority, competitive hockey is over after U16. Enjoy the ride and support all the kids. It goes by too fast!

Too many delusional parents ruin it for everybody else. Kids are usually fine after games with coaches decisions and parents ruin their heads in car rides and home time conversations with other delusional parents. Kids then enter rinks with the same toxic attitudes from their parents. It happens at every age and every level. We forget it’s a game and these kids are lucky enough to be playing at the highest level. No one likes to see their child upset and we need to realize parents are the main reason for ruining the greatest game on earth they have the privilege to play. If 99% don’t make a living out of this game why do parents contribute to creating a toxic environment in a game we all love?

That is super easy to figure it out....the toxic environment is from the creation of an UNFAIR SYSTEM that rewards early maturation and corruption (kick backs). Most importantly, and this is the hardest part for coaches to understand...at this stage of Growth and Development (Learn to Train - LTAD)...THE COACHES DON"T KNOW WHICH KIDS ARE TALENTED YET! They are just seeing early maturation, and playing the men so they can WIN!

All the studies show this, yet ALL THE COACHES (99% uneducated) think they have it all figured out with Talent Identification. So the answer is simple...just make it fair for everyone to succeed at this stage of development! And the question back to you is ----Why is this so hard to understand? Is it culture? Is it ego? Is it lack of education? Is it money, and they don't care? All of them?

Is it ironic that the 3 kids shorter then CS on VK, do not get to play?

23 16 44 had a view, but 23 had the best seat in the house. Dad’s delusional, and yes the kid is good but not for a top team.
16 same thing but can fly
44 going to grow and is a goal scorer

Keep the last one and the other two are cuts

[Guest]

At this point, finishing U14 AAA and transitioning to U15 AAA you need ask yourself a question - Why is my kid still playing? There are a few answers
1) He wants to have fun, and after U16 its beerleagues
- then move to the midpack team where you will win some games, have like minded friends and win some mid-pack tourneys to remember (may be even some summer Canlan AA trouney - but who cares, for memories a medal is medal). The main point is - stop being obsessed about coaches, playing time, stats etc. And statistically, that's where most will end ...
2) He wants to play OHL and then have an shot at NHL draft or NCAA. Then you can honeslty answer yourself what makes a player making a draft. Being on a top team, able to win at critical times, score at critical games (not when you run-time someone in the middle of 2nd) contributes a lot to that. U16 Gthl has 2 stud teams - DMF and TT and 3 runners ups (JRC, VK and TM) in comparison to U14 (with 2 stud teams and 1 runner up) - AND these two top teams have 1/3 of the first two rounds of draft (20 players) and the 3 runners up have another third (another 20 players).
It is very likely (based on both stats, team composition, future selections and where the kids from other teams are right now) that the current U14 top teams will take the 50% of the draft in two years. For sure, a kid from Elgin may go under #1 and a kid from COW may go under #3, but its the numbers game in the end....
- So if you want to be there - get on a top team and try to fight for every second of ice you can get, and if you are not big enough, compensate with skill, grit and iq. Yes, you have to be liked by coach as well. So if you dont get that kind of treatment - consider your options - time is ticking.
3) You are certain that your kid is a 'late bloomer' and want to invest in him so he becomes a spuerstar when he is 20. Its possible, and there lots of examples like that - "pavol datsuk" is the one I like
- then dont worry about the team at all. Let him play whenever, train and hope for the best (and plan to fund it for another 6 years) - but be prepared for the outcome of echl training camp and then a stint in the second french division, where the pay is a bowl of soup and a very nice baget.

But in any case, stop complaining about top 3 orgs and the coaching. All three are different and good and have different objectives:
1) VK needs to win, to have as many players at draft as possible so his resume is built up and he can move up in the world
2) JRC needs to have players who are paying the fees at his school and winning is very important but comes second after that objectives
3) TM just needs to be in top 3 to keep reputation

You figured it out here…lol. Cookie cutter and you figured out the recipe. The kid playing on VK has aspirations to play in the show and the kid playing on the Reps is a future beer leaguer aspriration. I’ll bet on 99% of this 2011 age group in this chat will be in the beer league by the time they’re 22. Stats don’t lie. Enjoy the ride it’s almost over. Let the kids have fun.

True enough. There will be a very very small percentage that play beyond 22 years of age. Another small percentage will play competitively after U16. It’s about prioritizing life and career ambitions. Some will stretch it out as long as they can, some will understand that hockey is not going to pay the bills for them so getting ahead in the real world might be a better option. There is no wrong answer and each kid/family has the right to do their own thing. For the majority, competitive hockey is over after U16. Enjoy the ride and support all the kids. It goes by too fast!

Too many delusional parents ruin it for everybody else. Kids are usually fine after games with coaches decisions and parents ruin their heads in car rides and home time conversations with other delusional parents. Kids then enter rinks with the same toxic attitudes from their parents. It happens at every age and every level. We forget it’s a game and these kids are lucky enough to be playing at the highest level. No one likes to see their child upset and we need to realize parents are the main reason for ruining the greatest game on earth they have the privilege to play. If 99% don’t make a living out of this game why do parents contribute to creating a toxic environment in a game we all love?

That is super easy to figure it out....the toxic environment is from the creation of an UNFAIR SYSTEM that rewards early maturation and corruption (kick backs). Most importantly, and this is the hardest part for coaches to understand...at this stage of Growth and Development (Learn to Train - LTAD)...THE COACHES DON"T KNOW WHICH KIDS ARE TALENTED YET! They are just seeing early maturation, and playing the men so they can WIN!

All the studies show this, yet ALL THE COACHES (99% uneducated) think they have it all figured out with Talent Identification. So the answer is simple...just make it fair for everyone to succeed at this stage of development! And the question back to you is ----Why is this so hard to understand? Is it culture? Is it ego? Is it lack of education? Is it money, and they don't care? All of them?

Is it ironic that the 3 kids shorter then CS on VK, do not get to play?

CS has little man syndrome. He just hit puberty 2 years ago.

[Guest]

You figured it out here…lol. Cookie cutter and you figured out the recipe. The kid playing on VK has aspirations to play in the show and the kid playing on the Reps is a future beer leaguer aspriration. I’ll bet on 99% of this 2011 age group in this chat will be in the beer league by the time they’re 22. Stats don’t lie. Enjoy the ride it’s almost over. Let the kids have fun.

True enough. There will be a very very small percentage that play beyond 22 years of age. Another small percentage will play competitively after U16. It’s about prioritizing life and career ambitions. Some will stretch it out as long as they can, some will understand that hockey is not going to pay the bills for them so getting ahead in the real world might be a better option. There is no wrong answer and each kid/family has the right to do their own thing. For the majority, competitive hockey is over after U16. Enjoy the ride and support all the kids. It goes by too fast!

Too many delusional parents ruin it for everybody else. Kids are usually fine after games with coaches decisions and parents ruin their heads in car rides and home time conversations with other delusional parents. Kids then enter rinks with the same toxic attitudes from their parents. It happens at every age and every level. We forget it’s a game and these kids are lucky enough to be playing at the highest level. No one likes to see their child upset and we need to realize parents are the main reason for ruining the greatest game on earth they have the privilege to play. If 99% don’t make a living out of this game why do parents contribute to creating a toxic environment in a game we all love?

That is super easy to figure it out....the toxic environment is from the creation of an UNFAIR SYSTEM that rewards early maturation and corruption (kick backs). Most importantly, and this is the hardest part for coaches to understand...at this stage of Growth and Development (Learn to Train - LTAD)...THE COACHES DON"T KNOW WHICH KIDS ARE TALENTED YET! They are just seeing early maturation, and playing the men so they can WIN!

All the studies show this, yet ALL THE COACHES (99% uneducated) think they have it all figured out with Talent Identification. So the answer is simple...just make it fair for everyone to succeed at this stage of development! And the question back to you is ----Why is this so hard to understand? Is it culture? Is it ego? Is it lack of education? Is it money, and they don't care? All of them?

Is it ironic that the 3 kids shorter then CS on VK, do not get to play?

23 16 44 had a view, but 23 had the best seat in the house. Dad’s delusional, and yes the kid is good but not for a top team.
16 same thing but can fly
44 going to grow and is a goal scorer

Keep the last one and the other two are cuts

19 will have the C next year. 11 and 10 can have the A’s. 44 is required for social media content. 23 parties over and 16 hasn’t been relevant for years. All 3 are examples of tyke superstars hanging on.

[Guest]

True enough. There will be a very very small percentage that play beyond 22 years of age. Another small percentage will play competitively after U16. It’s about prioritizing life and career ambitions. Some will stretch it out as long as they can, some will understand that hockey is not going to pay the bills for them so getting ahead in the real world might be a better option. There is no wrong answer and each kid/family has the right to do their own thing. For the majority, competitive hockey is over after U16. Enjoy the ride and support all the kids. It goes by too fast!

Too many delusional parents ruin it for everybody else. Kids are usually fine after games with coaches decisions and parents ruin their heads in car rides and home time conversations with other delusional parents. Kids then enter rinks with the same toxic attitudes from their parents. It happens at every age and every level. We forget it’s a game and these kids are lucky enough to be playing at the highest level. No one likes to see their child upset and we need to realize parents are the main reason for ruining the greatest game on earth they have the privilege to play. If 99% don’t make a living out of this game why do parents contribute to creating a toxic environment in a game we all love?

That is super easy to figure it out....the toxic environment is from the creation of an UNFAIR SYSTEM that rewards early maturation and corruption (kick backs). Most importantly, and this is the hardest part for coaches to understand...at this stage of Growth and Development (Learn to Train - LTAD)...THE COACHES DON"T KNOW WHICH KIDS ARE TALENTED YET! They are just seeing early maturation, and playing the men so they can WIN!

All the studies show this, yet ALL THE COACHES (99% uneducated) think they have it all figured out with Talent Identification. So the answer is simple...just make it fair for everyone to succeed at this stage of development! And the question back to you is ----Why is this so hard to understand? Is it culture? Is it ego? Is it lack of education? Is it money, and they don't care? All of them?

Is it ironic that the 3 kids shorter then CS on VK, do not get to play?

23 16 44 had a view, but 23 had the best seat in the house. Dad’s delusional, and yes the kid is good but not for a top team.
16 same thing but can fly
44 going to grow and is a goal scorer

Keep the last one and the other two are cuts

19 will have the C next year. 11 and 10 can have the A’s. 44 is required for social media content. 23 parties over and 16 hasn’t been relevant for years. All 3 are examples of tyke superstars hanging on.

I watched the game on LiveBarn.

Game Recap:VK is in trouble next year with 1 in net. CS also doesn't trust his defence, players 4, 96, 47, and 12 didn't get a shift in the third period. Additionally, forwards 17 and 13 played a maximum of two shifts in the third. CS panicked and shortened his bench to just five players JrC might still win a championship cause the coach has lost the dressing room.

[Guest]

Vk
JrC
TM

Jealousy = MHT

[Guest]

Too many delusional parents ruin it for everybody else. Kids are usually fine after games with coaches decisions and parents ruin their heads in car rides and home time conversations with other delusional parents. Kids then enter rinks with the same toxic attitudes from their parents. It happens at every age and every level. We forget it’s a game and these kids are lucky enough to be playing at the highest level. No one likes to see their child upset and we need to realize parents are the main reason for ruining the greatest game on earth they have the privilege to play. If 99% don’t make a living out of this game why do parents contribute to creating a toxic environment in a game we all love?

That is super easy to figure it out....the toxic environment is from the creation of an UNFAIR SYSTEM that rewards early maturation and corruption (kick backs). Most importantly, and this is the hardest part for coaches to understand...at this stage of Growth and Development (Learn to Train - LTAD)...THE COACHES DON"T KNOW WHICH KIDS ARE TALENTED YET! They are just seeing early maturation, and playing the men so they can WIN!

All the studies show this, yet ALL THE COACHES (99% uneducated) think they have it all figured out with Talent Identification. So the answer is simple...just make it fair for everyone to succeed at this stage of development! And the question back to you is ----Why is this so hard to understand? Is it culture? Is it ego? Is it lack of education? Is it money, and they don't care? All of them?

Is it ironic that the 3 kids shorter then CS on VK, do not get to play?

23 16 44 had a view, but 23 had the best seat in the house. Dad’s delusional, and yes the kid is good but not for a top team.
16 same thing but can fly
44 going to grow and is a goal scorer

Keep the last one and the other two are cuts

19 will have the C next year. 11 and 10 can have the A’s. 44 is required for social media content. 23 parties over and 16 hasn’t been relevant for years. All 3 are examples of tyke superstars hanging on.

I watched the game on LiveBarn.

Game Recap:VK is in trouble next year with 1 in net. CS also doesn't trust his defence, players 4, 96, 47, and 12 didn't get a shift in the third period. Additionally, forwards 17 and 13 played a maximum of two shifts in the third. CS panicked and shortened his bench to just five players JrC might still win a championship cause the coach has lost the dressing room.

Tell us you’re a loser without telling us you’re a loser. Watching 13 year olds play and then posting on MHT about which kids watched in the third. Did junior sit next to you while you gloated about which kids didn’t play? Or was he playing PS5 eating cookies?