This guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pmThere we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pmThis is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:00 pmFor full context, if you are into sports science, you should read this -https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/the ... y%20system.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 11:53 am Premier League in soccer, check out their program that they are spending $$$$ millions on for development and talent identification-
https://www.premierleague.com/youth/EPPP
Consulting with Dr Sean Cummings, from Bath!
Always striving to find innovative and effective ways to enhance the production or more and better home-grown players, the Premier League have implemented a range of programmes to aid and inform player recruitment, development and transition through Foundation, Youth Development and Professional Development phases.
Clubs can not only track all information that is relevant to the Academy through the League’s Performance Management Application (PMA) and Injury Surveillance, but they also benefit from the help of Club Support Managers (CSMs), with each one the first point of contact and support to their assigned Club’s Academy.
The League has also launched the Bio-Banding programme, with a series of tournaments organised each season with the aim of matching players based on their biological age instead of the usual chronological age groups, which historically makes it tougher for players born in the latter stages of the British school year (September to August) to make the grade. Growth and Maturation Screening is also used to assess all Academy players’ biological growth.
Leading the way......and Canadian Hockey falling behind yet again!
The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!
2011 AAA
Re: 2011 AAA
Re: 2011 AAA
GTHL is filled with some corrupt ,physocopath coachesGuest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pmThis guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pmThere we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pmThis is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:00 pmFor full context, if you are into sports science, you should read this -https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/the ... y%20system.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 11:53 am Premier League in soccer, check out their program that they are spending $$$$ millions on for development and talent identification-
https://www.premierleague.com/youth/EPPP
Consulting with Dr Sean Cummings, from Bath!
Always striving to find innovative and effective ways to enhance the production or more and better home-grown players, the Premier League have implemented a range of programmes to aid and inform player recruitment, development and transition through Foundation, Youth Development and Professional Development phases.
Clubs can not only track all information that is relevant to the Academy through the League’s Performance Management Application (PMA) and Injury Surveillance, but they also benefit from the help of Club Support Managers (CSMs), with each one the first point of contact and support to their assigned Club’s Academy.
The League has also launched the Bio-Banding programme, with a series of tournaments organised each season with the aim of matching players based on their biological age instead of the usual chronological age groups, which historically makes it tougher for players born in the latter stages of the British school year (September to August) to make the grade. Growth and Maturation Screening is also used to assess all Academy players’ biological growth.
Leading the way......and Canadian Hockey falling behind yet again!
The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!
Now Ball less coaches
Candian hockey has very bright future.
Re: 2011 AAA
Slow news day back to talking about short kids and their dad’s big egos. Let’s move on
Re: 2011 AAA
VK next year has 2 coaches kids coming in.
HOS 9th F and JC 6th D
How will dads handle that?!?
HOS 9th F and JC 6th D
How will dads handle that?!?
Re: 2011 AAA
Despite your superior intellect, you are not fooling anyone replying to your own posts. My dog can tell which hand his treat is in 84.37% of the time and it doesn’t make him a genius.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pmThis guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pmThere we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pmThis is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:00 pmFor full context, if you are into sports science, you should read this -https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/the ... y%20system.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 11:53 am Premier League in soccer, check out their program that they are spending $$$$ millions on for development and talent identification-
https://www.premierleague.com/youth/EPPP
Consulting with Dr Sean Cummings, from Bath!
Always striving to find innovative and effective ways to enhance the production or more and better home-grown players, the Premier League have implemented a range of programmes to aid and inform player recruitment, development and transition through Foundation, Youth Development and Professional Development phases.
Clubs can not only track all information that is relevant to the Academy through the League’s Performance Management Application (PMA) and Injury Surveillance, but they also benefit from the help of Club Support Managers (CSMs), with each one the first point of contact and support to their assigned Club’s Academy.
The League has also launched the Bio-Banding programme, with a series of tournaments organised each season with the aim of matching players based on their biological age instead of the usual chronological age groups, which historically makes it tougher for players born in the latter stages of the British school year (September to August) to make the grade. Growth and Maturation Screening is also used to assess all Academy players’ biological growth.
Leading the way......and Canadian Hockey falling behind yet again!
The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!
When you’re ready to get real, just post your kids name here and ask all the Hockey dads to let you know if your kid has got it or not. If they can remain anonymous, you’ll get the real feedback you’re hoping to get by digging through BS online studies to confirm your bias that your kid has a chance.
Re: 2011 AAA
Did not self reply to anything…you readily jumped to thinking you have figured it out, unfortunately your mental health is suffering as a result!Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:43 pmDespite your superior intellect, you are not fooling anyone replying to your own posts. My dog can tell which hand his treat is in 84.37% of the time and it doesn’t make him a genius.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pmThis guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pmThere we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pmThis is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:00 pmFor full context, if you are into sports science, you should read this -https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/the ... y%20system.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 11:53 am Premier League in soccer, check out their program that they are spending $$$$ millions on for development and talent identification-
https://www.premierleague.com/youth/EPPP
Consulting with Dr Sean Cummings, from Bath!
Always striving to find innovative and effective ways to enhance the production or more and better home-grown players, the Premier League have implemented a range of programmes to aid and inform player recruitment, development and transition through Foundation, Youth Development and Professional Development phases.
Clubs can not only track all information that is relevant to the Academy through the League’s Performance Management Application (PMA) and Injury Surveillance, but they also benefit from the help of Club Support Managers (CSMs), with each one the first point of contact and support to their assigned Club’s Academy.
The League has also launched the Bio-Banding programme, with a series of tournaments organised each season with the aim of matching players based on their biological age instead of the usual chronological age groups, which historically makes it tougher for players born in the latter stages of the British school year (September to August) to make the grade. Growth and Maturation Screening is also used to assess all Academy players’ biological growth.
Leading the way......and Canadian Hockey falling behind yet again!
The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!
When you’re ready to get real, just post your kids name here and ask all the Hockey dads to let you know if your kid has got it or not. If they can remain anonymous, you’ll get the real feedback you’re hoping to get by digging through BS online studies to confirm your bias that your kid has a chance.
And for the record I am not talking about my kid, he is done hockey. I am talking about bettering the process of developing players and having the sport grow with the success rate of athletes funnelling through the system.
It seems odd you would fight something that makes Canadian hockey better…… but I guess odd and conspiracies is the new world order isn’t it!
Re: 2011 AAA
Out of curiosity, why do you think anonymous hockey dads would possess any sort of credentials on talent identification? This is exactly the issue with hockey in Canada, volunteer coaches and hockey parents have zero education, experience or skill in TI.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:43 pmDespite your superior intellect, you are not fooling anyone replying to your own posts. My dog can tell which hand his treat is in 84.37% of the time and it doesn’t make him a genius.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pmThis guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pmThere we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pmThis is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:00 pmFor full context, if you are into sports science, you should read this -https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/the ... y%20system.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 11:53 am Premier League in soccer, check out their program that they are spending $$$$ millions on for development and talent identification-
https://www.premierleague.com/youth/EPPP
Consulting with Dr Sean Cummings, from Bath!
Always striving to find innovative and effective ways to enhance the production or more and better home-grown players, the Premier League have implemented a range of programmes to aid and inform player recruitment, development and transition through Foundation, Youth Development and Professional Development phases.
Clubs can not only track all information that is relevant to the Academy through the League’s Performance Management Application (PMA) and Injury Surveillance, but they also benefit from the help of Club Support Managers (CSMs), with each one the first point of contact and support to their assigned Club’s Academy.
The League has also launched the Bio-Banding programme, with a series of tournaments organised each season with the aim of matching players based on their biological age instead of the usual chronological age groups, which historically makes it tougher for players born in the latter stages of the British school year (September to August) to make the grade. Growth and Maturation Screening is also used to assess all Academy players’ biological growth.
Leading the way......and Canadian Hockey falling behind yet again!
The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!
When you’re ready to get real, just post your kids name here and ask all the Hockey dads to let you know if your kid has got it or not. If they can remain anonymous, you’ll get the real feedback you’re hoping to get by digging through BS online studies to confirm your bias that your kid has a chance.
Re: 2011 AAA
Trust the science you dumbass. Just shut up no one cares about your nonsense. How many boosters are you on? Weirdo get a life!!!Guest wrote: ↑Thu Apr 03, 2025 11:33 pmAs if you’ve read it you uneducated cretinGuest wrote: ↑Thu Apr 03, 2025 5:55 pmNo ,anyone cannot be a future star. Sounds like you have been listening to the skills coach too much. Being able to compete pre puberty with post puberty kids is one of the largest indicators of a very elite ceiling in hockey!Guest wrote: ↑Thu Apr 03, 2025 2:06 pmAnyone can be a future super starGuest wrote: ↑Thu Apr 03, 2025 1:59 pmIs he too small b/c he has not grown yet, and will be a good size?
Or is he too small and will remain small , has already started growing?
There is a massive difference b/t the two scenarios, if he is the prior , could be a future superstar !
Nick Paul was not even top 100
Look at him now
But question is why RP choose to play at sens if he is future super star
Just read the sports science data!![]()
Re: 2011 AAA
Let’s get this straight your kid is done minor hockey and yet you live on a 2011 chat posting science garbage. When you were taking boosters staying home saving lives during covid, tell us you wore a cape and told your family you were a superhero. #whatapatheticloseryouare #cretanGuest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:50 pmDid not self reply to anything…you readily jumped to thinking you have figured it out, unfortunately your mental health is suffering as a result!Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:43 pmDespite your superior intellect, you are not fooling anyone replying to your own posts. My dog can tell which hand his treat is in 84.37% of the time and it doesn’t make him a genius.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pmThis guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pmThere we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pmThis is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:00 pm
For full context, if you are into sports science, you should read this -https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/the ... y%20system.
The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!
When you’re ready to get real, just post your kids name here and ask all the Hockey dads to let you know if your kid has got it or not. If they can remain anonymous, you’ll get the real feedback you’re hoping to get by digging through BS online studies to confirm your bias that your kid has a chance.
And for the record I am not talking about my kid, he is done hockey. I am talking about bettering the process of developing players and having the sport grow with the success rate of athletes funnelling through the system.
It seems odd you would fight something that makes Canadian hockey better…… but I guess odd and conspiracies is the new world order isn’t it!
Re: 2011 AAA
Are you suggesting that none of the hockey dads in McDavids cohort knew he was going to be star?Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 5:00 pmOut of curiosity, why do you think anonymous hockey dads would possess any sort of credentials on talent identification? This is exactly the issue with hockey in Canada, volunteer coaches and hockey parents have zero education, experience or skill in TI.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:43 pmDespite your superior intellect, you are not fooling anyone replying to your own posts. My dog can tell which hand his treat is in 84.37% of the time and it doesn’t make him a genius.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 2:06 pmThis guy gets it. 2 posts back, another delusional idiot but he used the word "efficacy" so he thinks hes smart.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:29 pmThere we go a good old fashioned hockey culture response, even sprinkled in a little COVID conspiracy theory. There is no arguing with you.....it is clear that you understand it all.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:14 pmThis is all pseudoscience. Just like when you believed that the COVID vaccine prevented transmission but you still got Covid and still spread covid yourself but and you still believed Teresa Tam anyway. It’s cognitive dissonance that triggers you when people challenge your belief that there’s a chance your small stature kid is going to progress to the highest levels of hockey. Dudes pretend they can measure biological markers,who will be a future star. If there were any significant level of confidence in the efficacy of these methods, all the nhl bound kids would be drafted by age 11 and the scouts wouldn’t be needed beyond major bantam. But prove me wrong by pasting another link to a bs article and go get your booster.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 12:00 pm
For full context, if you are into sports science, you should read this -https://www.bath.ac.uk/case-studies/the ... y%20system.
The NHL is tiny compared to Soccer....the NHL spends nothing on this. So the question is why is soccer spending millions on this? I guess they love wasting their money according to you:) The best portfolio managers in the world are right 64% of the time, and the best batters in MLB are succussful 3.5 times out of ten. Why do you argue that something needs to be 100% to be successful????? Wake up buddy, get educated!
When you’re ready to get real, just post your kids name here and ask all the Hockey dads to let you know if your kid has got it or not. If they can remain anonymous, you’ll get the real feedback you’re hoping to get by digging through BS online studies to confirm your bias that your kid has a chance.
If your pseudoscience predictor is accurate, why don’t you tell us who the stars will be 3 years from now? Why withhold this pertinent information that will confirm you intellectual superiority?
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 12860 Views
-
Last post by 2011needagoalie